I think there's a real chance the 1922 will look to alter both the "one year minimum" clause and try to remove selection rights from party members.
If you're a Tory MP surely its the only chance you've got? The experiment is laid bare and it has absolutely nothing to do with political parties.
Interesting constitutional question.
Since the start of the 20th century (I couldn’t be bothered going back any further), there has only been one Parliament where two different PMs have been replaced without a further General Election taking place. That was in 1940, at the moment of this country’s greatest peril, when a GE would have been both impractical and undesirable.
So if the 1922 Committee did decide to dump Truss, we would be in genuinely unprecedented territory.
Would the new King (who likes to do things differently) allow a party, which is so unpopular with the country, to indulge themselves in yet another leadership election during an economic crisis? Or would he insist on a fresh mandate through a General Election?