Canyoudigit
Well-known member
It's the crowd I feel sorry for,I guess they'll have to chalk it up to experience
Okay so.., you’re saying we shouldn’t protest against something because the government will ban it. But then by that logic surely they’ve won anyway because nobody is protesting?Yes but banning these specific protests have got huge numbers of the public on the governments side, and expect it to be a huge part of their election campaign to push it even further
What's your point?I note that you didn't mention what races, genders and environmental-persuasions the other balls represent......
Cue the punsIt's the crowd I feel sorry for,I guess they'll have to chalk it up to experience
Can you imagine the suffragettes movement today? Wokey liberals disrupting hard working people.Okay so.., you’re saying we shouldn’t protest against something because the government will ban it. But then by that logic surely they’ve won anyway because nobody is protesting.
The point is that there will be disruption. There is no way around it. It’s why you need an effective opposition, someone to stand up for the truth and for what is right instead of cowering in fear. You’ll win no arguments by hiding away.
I think they would baulk at the suggestion.Maybe they'll give spectators their money back to cushion the blow?
As long as it hits Eddie Hearn in the pocket I could live with it.It is not a peaceful protest though, they have scattered powder over a table that will need to be stripped, cleaned and recovered. They have spoilt the entertainment of people who will have travelled and more than likely will be staying in hotels.
Too many trivialising these protests.
Give it a rest.Give them a break!
Stop winding them up, give it a rest...I think they would baulk at the suggestion.
I could have predicted the posters here speaking out against this, always on the wrong side of the argument
I support reducing our reliance on oil.
What's this specific protest going to achieve?
It's a mildly annoying disruption for the small minority of people in the UK that actively care about snooker, at an event that has absolutely nothing to do with oil consumption.
For the main part, it just makes the two protesters seem daft for disrupting that event.
At least with the protests involving transport, you can see what they were trying to achieve.
People are talking about it. It’s being covered on the news. They will consider that job done.
They're talking about the daft protest, not the message.
It’s clearly a bridge too farI think they would baulk at the suggestion.
Surely we'd rather this than them blocking ambulances etc? That would be double the disruption.At least with the protests involving transport, you can see what they were trying to achieve.
What has that got to with snooker?Taken from the "Just Stop Oil" website