That is what they used to get votes off the Lib Dem’s and win the 2015 election, must be looking to re release all the old hits…Look on Daily Mail homepage and get a sore finger scrolling al the way down until you get to the article saying Starmer will fail to win a majority in an election with these results - and SNP glee that they will hold the balance of power at the next election
It's actually happening. He's going to claim election fraud isn't he?
Hadn't realised the recount was for dodgy PCC Steve Turner's attempted run.
Well he does know a lot about being a fraud.It's actually happening. He's going to claim election fraud isn't he?
Saltburn voters don't vote for Labour neither - their councillors are all independent so the above logic says they avoid been "shafted" by all the major parties?Easy to explain.
Working class Normanby. thick as pig . Not a brain in most of their heads. Believe all the Houchen tells them. Getting a new swimming pool and a set of traffic lights in Eston Square all paid for personally by lemon head Young.
Middle class Saltburn, not thick as pig . Got a few brains between them. Can think for themselves. Some read newspapers other than the Sun and Express. Understand that they've been shafted. Vote accordingly.
Caught in possession of stolen elections?It's actually happening. He's going to claim election fraud isn't he?
Three recounts!
Hadn't realised the recount was for dodgy PCC Steve Turner's attempted run.
That's what happens when power hungry folk can't accept losingThree recounts!
They did not want to accept the results.
The only mitigating context is that each recount gave a slightly different losing figure.
I was at the count, they went outside after the initial attempt at declaring and overheard some of their conversation, not one word about their ward, it was all about them and their plans.That's what happens when power hungry folk can't accept losing
Sadly, it doesn't surprise meI was at the count, they went outside after the initial attempt at declaring and overheard some of their conversation, not one word about their ward, it was all about them and their plans.
Me neither, his campaign was awful and he is aggressive whenever disagreed with.Sadly, it doesn't surprise me
That is exactly it, if she wins on a third count I cannot imagine it would blow by without a stink.Word is Labour guy won, Libdem came 2nd and Mrs Turner 3rd 5 votes behind, a recount was offered and accepted, after recount Mrs Turner was 2 votes ahead, so a 3rd count was asked for and agreed, this will take place on Tuesday. It's not stone, but it's what I have been told.
The winner will get, what, 1000 votes. How could the recount have been so different to the original?That is exactly it, if she wins on a third count I cannot imagine it would blow by without a stink.
Mad. Maybe need to use potatoes and paint like we do with 2 year olds.its all about the markings on the ballot paper - The X - some are not legible and get put to one side, election agents are asked to agree to discard / or not.
ive seen 'agents' of the candidate argue that a pencil mark (a tick / straight line / squiggle / circle etc) anywhere on the top half of the paper is an indication for that candidate (if its their candidate) and seek a discard if its not. and similarly if its towards the bottom of the paper - its location and proximity to a candidates name can be argued over with much gusto .
ive seen it and it can get quite fractious.