Ban religion

those acts are charitable, but it will be part of a broader church and will have income that is going on assets.

I have no doubt there are many well intentioned vicars, and priests, and rabbi etc. on an individual basis, that doesn't stop the institutes from being corporate money making, tax avoiding hypocrites. Anyway it shouldn't require charity to resolve these issues it's the governments job to do that. We used to have surestart now a church helps, we used to have homeless shelters and drug abuse clinics, now clergy that aren't really trained to resolve those issues at root cause are getting involved. Good intentions or otherwise, it isn't really the right approach.
Your experience is obviously very different to mine. The things I described are paid for mainly by normal everyday peoples contribution, and that is where the money goes rather than into the pocket of some mega rich money grabbing organisation.
 
Back
Top