OK GarethI don't think foden changes anything. He doesn't take the ball out of defence. He doesn't win the midfield battle. We weren't dominating the game trying to break down a packed midfield. We were being outplayed. I would still have expected him to come on though.
Southgate is in denial. Deluded idiot.
Yes I was and I’d be building the side around Bellingham and foden for the next ten yearsLook you were all salivating about Jude Bellingham. He was *****.
Yes I was and I’d be building the side around Bellingham and foden for the next ten years
not on mount and rice
Next ten years? Were talking about today's game. Doesn't matter what he's going to be playing like in 2032?!?!Yes I was and I’d be building the side around Bellingham and foden for the next ten years
not on mount and rice
Bellingham did **** all tonight. Which was predictable given the media jizzathon over him beforehand.
Look you were all salivating about Jude Bellingham. He was *****. Sometimes the problems in the game are a little bigger than just bringing on an attacking midfielder.
Ah bless
You can either see it or you can’t.
Bellingham did **** all tonight. Which was predictable given the media jizzathon over him beforehand.
English players always look better than they are because they’re surrounded by gifted foreigners.
He wasn’t. Was there to steady the ship and get a draw. Negative I know.How was Henderson going to change the game.![]()
How was Henderson going to change the game.![]()
Yes, the whole of the midfield was poor. There were massive gaps. No pressing. The point is one player on his own doesnt solve all that. If we play badly it's either foden/Bellingham/grealish should play. Overly simplistic.He had no options whenever he got the ball, Bellingham was not the issue today.
Absolutely pathetic post.
Yes I started a thread on exactly thatBefore the game against Iran, did you think Bellingham was the messiah?