Gueye refused to wear Rainbow shirt

As Bumface advises. It's best to ignore him. You'll never change his hateful, homophobic views and the more you engage, the more hideous justifications you'll get for his backwards ideals
You still have not answered the very simplistic questions you were posed. Your narrow world view and its influence could enable the truly hideous percentile in society to be enabled, to sexually abuse women and children.

Your views can be deemed as hateful to women. You have the opportunity to explain how your safe guarding of the vulnerable would work, and how the sex-based rights of women would not be diminished.

The insults serve to highlight that you are not interested in protecting the vulnerable, and women’s rights at all.

The floor is yours.

You must despise seahorses.

With all respect none of the people I support, or those I work with identify as a sea horse ... Yet. We don't have laws and policies for that, but we do know which sea horse is male and female via biological science to start with.
 
Last edited:
Is wearing a rainbow symbol the same issue as wearing the Red Poppy?

There are not political statements, but not footballing ones neither e.g. commercial symbols raising money for the club or a club brand

My general thoughts are players do have a right to wear club endrosed symbols (non commercial) or not wear them. So a player has right to wear a poppy or not etc.

Myself I am happy to wear red poppies and rainbows, but that is my choice.
 
I am very weary of forcing people to give reasons for their choices and assuming something when they don't.

This thinking (if you are not for us you are against us) was popular in Nazi Germany. So unmarried pepole could be sent to concentration camps, because they were not acting in a German way and could not justify the way they behaved to the Police.
 
You must despise seahorses.
A good example of who this person is: he's claiming I haven't answered a question that I have answered three times despite him rephrasing it.

A nasty, backwards homophobic troll. Best stuck on ignore so his nasty rants can only be seen by like minded individuals
 
What the fcuk? Where has this come from? What are you going on about?
Don't bother mate. I keep telling people to ignore him but they won't listen and they keep bumping this thread and now I'm doing it too and I shouldn't be. People like him just aren't worth engaging with mate. Smalltown was right. You're not going to be able to cure him of his horrible, poisonous views on a message board so it's pointless even trying to.
 
Expect the whole Woke terrorists on here will leap on this but What is his sin? I didn’t think he said anything derogatory, showed a lack of respect or understanding for the LGBT community in his actions. I thought he simply chose not to wear an additional symbol on his shirt because it promoted something he personally didn’t wish to promote on religious grounds. Alongside sexual orientation and race, religion is a also a protected characteristics . You can have understanding, and respect for you fellow man but when it comes to LGBTQ unless you are willing to openly promote and show your support you are someone to be vilified, castigated and cancelled, removing your ability to make a living. This isn’t because of anything you said but because you chose not to wear a rainbow badge. When did that become an unforgivable act? Are those who don’t take the knee facing such similar treatment - of course not. We need education and discussion on issues like this . It is precisely the attitude on here that is polarising opinion in the UK and actually further dividing rather than supporting the needs of those marginalised in society.
Woke shît is turning the world mad
 
What the fcuk? Where has this come from? What are you going on about?

What are you going on about? The poster appears to believe anybody can be a woman, if they identify as a woman, which does not not meet the current threshold of the law (that equalities act again).

If we as a society undermine safeguarding measures like single sex spaces the outcomes will be?
 
Last edited:
What are you going on about? The posters appears to believe anybody can be a woman, if they identify as a woman, which does not not meet the current threshold of the law (that equalities act again).

If we as a society undermine safeguarding measures like single sex spaces the outcomes will be?
Jesus wept. Get some help mate. There's something seriously wrong with you. And you're incredibly boring too and contribute nothing of any worth to this site. You're entitled to your opinion of course, however horrible that opinion may be. I feel sorry for you. You must have a very crap life to have so much hatred in you. I've never put anyone on ignore on here and I never will so I'll still end up having to read or skip over your obnoxious posts but I definitely won't be replying to you again after this. I shouldn't be doing it now. You're not worth it.
 
Jesus wept. Get some help mate. There's something seriously wrong with you. And you're incredibly boring too and contribute nothing of any worth to this site. You're entitled to your opinion of course, however horrible that opinion may be. I feel sorry for you. You must have a very crap life to have so much hatred in you. I've never put anyone on ignore on here and I never will so I'll still end up having to read or skip over your obnoxious posts but I definitely won't be replying to you again after this. I shouldn't be doing it now. You're not worth it.

Another series of insults is not a reply to post 105.
 
Wearing rainbow-coloured shirts is illegal in Senegal? :cool:
Stocko is one of those hypocrite types. If it's someone in the UK from, say, Iraq, eating halal meat no doubt he'll get angry at that. But when it comes to a player doing something he agree with its "well he would do the same in his home country"
 
Back
Top