No.. it’s not.
You’re embarrassed for calling for the head of our manager after his record being comparable to Karanka’s.. then jumping on this no wins in 3 months malarkey!
Ah well, we have to carry some duffers don’t we.
It's in no way comparable, as I've repeatedly told you, but you keep pretending and trying to trick other people, and other people take your graphic at face value because they don't expect a Boro fan to go Fox News with the truth.
I have no problem with Neil Warnock and never once called for his head, I was actually shocked when he was sacked, so not sure what you're on about there.
I just don't like people making disingenuous arguments to pretend he did better than he actually did whilst here or to diminish how well another manger did.
Including 15 results under the previous management, results that were so bad that they got Mowbray sacked, for Karanka's "first season" is b***ks.
First 8 games:
Karanka - W4, D1, L3, 13 points, scored 11, conceded 7.
Warnock - W4, L4, 12 points, scored 11, conceded 11.
First 46 games across all seasons:
Karanka - W22, D12, L13, 78 points, scored 59, conceded 38.
Warnock - W20, D8, L18, 66 points, scored 53, conceded 57.
First full season:
Karanka - W25, D10, L11, 85 points, scored 68, conceded 37.
Warnock - W18, D10, L18, 64 points, scored 55, conceded 55.
The only part of their tenure here that's comparable is the opening 8 games, and even then Karanka did better.
We won more under Karanka, we scored more under Karanka, we conceded less under Karanka, we lost less under Karanka.
All these numbers are before the promotion season too.