The concern if they did, is it would split the Labour vote and Tories could ultimately benefit.
What's classic Labour certainly not Starmerism.For me he’s always been more in tune with the Green Party than classic labour ( especially his views on defence spending) , so are you surprised they have tried to bring him on board and seize on the momentum or err momentum.
And no doubt this will be another pro and anti Corbyn and Starmer 100 threadDid you know - and its prob new news
Some people on this board love Corbyn and some think he is a political liability
The problem with that is where do you find someone like Corbyn without the baggage that makes him what he is.I am very pro-Corbyn's policies and I think he is honest, has integrity and argues the case for what he believes in. I also fully recognise that he is far too easy a target to successfully lead a party to win an election. Someone with a cleaner history but his politics would clean up. I thought Starmer could be that person but sadly he is far closer to Boris than Corbyn.
Hope it does better than the Ill fated scargill Socialist Labour PartyThere are moves to create a new left wing party which would I imagine gain traction if labour won the next election but were too right wing for us leftists
And others are more concerned with the policies that will affect their way of life. They're becoming an endangered species.Did you know - and its prob new news
Some people on this board love Corbyn and some think he is a political liability
I think the Green Party would gain more support than they'd lose by getting Corbyn on board. It seems like a good move to me.
The concern if they did, is it would split the Labour vote and Tories could ultimately benefit.
I think you underestimate the left.Maybe in Islington North but I can't see it translating over the country as a whole. I think people overestimate the swing that Corbyn would have nationally in an election.
I think you underestimate the left.