Sue Gray

She's been offered the job, not appointed.
And the story has been in the public eye since before the WhatsApp messages were released.

Yes, true. But it wouldn’t be allowed anywhere near daylight unless she hadn’t agreed to take it
Perhaps she will withdraw now.
Though I still believe the revelations in Oikenshcitt’s exposures could sink them for good. At the same time giving a boost to the De Formed Party.
Because people are still angry over what happened. Also due to manipulation the so called ‘enquiry’ result will certainly be held back until after the election.
 
Johnson did not resign over 'Partygate'. He resigned because it came to light that he knowingly had a sexual predator, Chris Pincher, in his Government and did nothing about it.
And because he knew that he was going to lose a vote of no confidence of Tory MP's.

Just as a matter of interest I know very little about photography, so does anyone know what type of camera and which lenses, Sue Gray used to take all of those photographs?
 
Breaking news on the BBC - Johnson may have misled Parliament.

No sh1t Sherlock. 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣


Well I for one am shocked to my very core!

I’ve been enjoying my new hobby of calling out people defending idiots like him on Simon Clarkes Facebook page. He has put a carefully worded post on about Sue Gray which has his moronic band of followers baying for blood. They’re too easy to pick off though
 
It's hilarious to see the usual rent a gob Tory MPs get all excited about this. It's such an obvious tactic now. I actually could start to pity them they look so desperate. Literally the tiniest of Stoires comes out and Tory HQ makes them all post near identical tweets whining about it. tragic to watch
 
This plays very well for Starmer as nobody is now talking about the Northern Ireland protocol and Rishi is no longer basking in the glow of it - instead hes back to trying to shake off all the $h!t he's been landed with over the Covid messages from Hancock and the partygate mess of Johnson. The Tories have played right into Starmers hands
 
He's now saying how can the report be taken seriously due to Sue Gry working for Starmer.

He will pedal this rubbish and people will believe him.
 
I've just read all of it. Yes, I know I'm a boring g*t.

As a Union official, one of my duties was to represent members at Discipline and Employment tribunals and I was generally pretty good at it. I used to say to our members, after seeing all the evidence, either to deny the charge because the evidence didn't support it or to admit the charge and plead mitigating circumstances, which quite often, there were. Then there was the advice, which luckily I rarely had to offer, which was to admit the charge and hope to God whoever was presiding at the hearing was in a good mood.

This case is firmly in the last category, looking at the evidence presented so far and unlike the other occasions when that was the case, I couldn't be happier.

Send him down!!!!!!
 
He is now reduced to the same level as Trump was in that thinking about it meant that classified documents became unclassified. What a miserable piece of excrement Johnson is.

"Johnson says the reason there is no evidence to show that he thought what was happening in No 10 was against the rules was because he did not think that.

He is certain there has been no contempt, he says."

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...08cbddc14ad253#block-640217358f08cbddc14ad253
 
Back
Top