probably wanted him to hand his notice in and leave, rather than pay him 18 months worth of wages on principleI would agree gibson probably only kept him on the vague hope he turn things round and not have to pay him off. I bet Gibson's was absolutely fuming with wilders behaviour.
clearly some legal clauses to prevent any talking about it. I would suspect he's technically on gardening leave until he finds a new job to save us paying him 18 months wages.Interesting
I think the fact he was sacked in the manner he was with no replacement lined up suggests it was a sacking not a removal.
Plus no comment from either party suggests that as well.
I don't agree at all re IS.He'll have a severely bruised ego I would think, he presents this image that he's a top top manager, but maybe that's just an indication that deep down he has some imposter syndrome
He won't say anything.. he wouldn't even mention our previous managers name!! Nah, if he blabs then it will all come out.. he wont want that.I don't agree at all re IS.
He will have a bruised ego, but will keep schtum to take the money.
I'd suggest he will be back in the game within a year when the financial equation works and will have his say on his version of what has happened.
He's not getting any money!Once he's got the money he is due, he will.
Wait and see.
Maybe he wanted Andy Carroll and Keinan Davis?I could understand him not being happy about lack of backing in the summer but January, I thought Balogun and Connelly were his picks?