Chris_Boro
Well-known member
Just to put this into a "what this would mean" scenario...
Labour 390 seat majority (520). Lib Dems the official opposition with 47 seats, Tories on 32 just ahead of the SNP on 28.
Last edited:
Superstu you have shown in this post why the Tories are struggling to land a glove on Sir Kier.Fair play to you for this ST. Don't think many/any of the Starmer cultists on here have been able to front up to this even as a possibility, but its actually pretty likely when you start to consider everything.
Starmers position on Israel/Palestine appears to be heavily influenced by donors, as does Streetings on privatisation and the NHS. The Scottish Labour Party leader was forced out by donors too. Then theres the policy deceptions that got Starmer the leadership in the first place. And the fact the party is under investigation for rigging candidate selections...
Edit: and of course the rumours around what went on between Starmer and Hoyle a few weeks back.
The point is anyone voting Labour to put a stop to tory corruption might well find we're moving from the frying pan to the fire.
Notice the use of the derogatory term 'Starmer Cultists' too.Superstu you have shown in this post why the Tories are struggling to land a glove on Sir Kier.
Talking about Labour led corruption that MIGHT happen sometime in the future, what MIGHT have happened with Hoyle. Gaza position APPEARING to be influenced by donors, policy DECEPTIONS when being accused of not having any policies, candidate rigging UNDER INVESTIGATION.
I appreciate all this heresay stuff is part of politics but you need more substance if it is to be regarded as anything more than bum fluff.
Whilst I largely agree, you have to question the appointment of Jack Lubner as leader/chair of Young Labour.I think suggestions Labour will be as corrupt (or worse) are way off.
Er no you don't.Whilst I largely agree, you have to question the appointment of Jack Lubner as leader/chair of Young Labour.
Democracy in action...
If Labour really is corrupt then surely Corbyn is to blame, after all the vast majority of re-elected MP's and new MP's were waved through or selected by Corbyn's Labour Party?
Said the author of Corbyn CavalryNotice the use of the derogatory term 'Starmer Cultists' too.
Just really juvenile.
I'm not a Labour member or would even describe myself as a Labour voter necessarily, so had to Google this.Whilst I largely agree, you have to question the appointment of Jack Lubner as leader/chair of Young Labour.
Democracy in action...
Yes that's what Scrote is inferring despite there being no evidence whatsoever to back up his allegation, only wild speculation.I mean yeah doesn't look great given his dad, but are you saying the vote was rigged or something?
The posters on this thread criticising Starmer and the Labour Party are not Labour Party supporters.Its always going to be a divided party
No they definitely are not Labour, I don’t believe they have ever been Labour despite all the Corbyn stuff, it would be interesting to know which of the other parties they are campaigning for, but in saying that, I’m not that interested in who they are or who they work for.The posters on this thread criticising Starmer and the Labour Party are not Labour Party supporters.
No they definitely are not Labour, I don’t believe they have ever been Labour despite all the Corbyn stuff, it would be interesting to know which of the other parties they are campaigning for, but in saying that, I’m not that interested in who they are or who they work for.
That’s good coming from you Superstuyou're ridiculous.
Superstu you have shown in this post why the Tories are struggling to land a glove on Sir Kier.
Talking about Labour led corruption that MIGHT happen sometime in the future, what MIGHT have happened with Hoyle. Gaza position APPEARING to be influenced by donors, policy DECEPTIONS when being accused of not having any policies, candidate rigging UNDER INVESTIGATION.
I appreciate all this heresay stuff is part of politics but you need more substance if it is to be regarded as anything more than bum fluff.
I’ve said what I’ve said Superstu, I think you are a good poster but I also think you are not fooling anybody with your tedious and constant criticism of Labour, Starmer and people who vote Labour. Without doubt you are agenda driven on a forum which is largely just full of punters who support the Boro. I think you should give it a rest quite frankly.The sheer hypocrisy to post this, and then later the same day insist I'm campaigning/working for a party. Don't you see how pathetic that is?
And think about what you're effectively saying here. For you there's no legitimate criticism of Starmer. Anyone who ever says anything not praising him is doing so for payment. Anyone who took umbridge at me saying the word cultist this morning, well... defend this nonsense why don't you.
I'm saying that having a father who is the largest party donor should have made all concerned seriously consider whether standing was a good idea. Whether it was directly corrupt isn't really the point. It looks bad. What happened to "it's all about the optics"?I'm not a Labour member or would even describe myself as a Labour voter necessarily, so had to Google this.
I mean yeah doesn't look great given his dad, but are you saying the vote was rigged or something?
Yet again, you make an accusation with zero proof and miss the mark with the accuracy of a reverse-hawkeye.Yes that's what Scrote is inferring despite there being no evidence whatsoever to back up his allegation, only wild speculation.
That's terrible. I hope the people doing it are found and prosecuted.Oh, and the lad is a Jew and has had to put up with an antisemitic twitter pile on
The posters on this thread criticising Starmer and the Labour Party are not Labour Party supporters.
This is ridiculous. It suggests that you would vote Labour regardless. No matter how far right they moved, or what was or wasn't in their manifesto you would just sheepishly vote Labour. No nuance, no parameters, you would just vote Labour. Extremely naive.No they definitely are not Labour, I don’t believe they have ever been Labour despite all the Corbyn stuff, it would be interesting to know which of the other parties they are campaigning for, but in saying that, I’m not that interested in who they are or who they work for.