Saving Christmas

When a vaccine is so close this really seems crazy to be, older people have been effectively shielding for almost a year now, to take the risk of allowing them to mix indoors with family for one day is pretty reckless when they will likely have had a vaccine within the next few months.
 
Family's will meet up for Xmas and frankly what can they do to stop it??

It's going to happen no matter what they have in place. Is it 'worth it' for another 25 day lockdown. Is it f*ck!!

Are we seriously saying so that family's can have a dinner and pass presents we should shut shops / gyms and pubs etc for another month? How many people does this effect financially? Another month could mean no job to go back too😕

I would argue that this is a bit of a smoke screen. I think they just want to lockdown for another month and using this as a kind of 'sweetener' as in 'look we are doing you a favour'.

I just don't see how a better Xmas can result in another lockdown and people think its a good idea?
 
Family's will meet up for Xmas and frankly what can they do to stop it??

It's going to happen no matter what they have in place. Is it 'worth it' for another 25 day lockdown. Is it f*ck!!

Are we seriously saying so that family's can have a dinner and pass presents we should shut shops / gyms and pubs etc for another month? How many people does this effect financially? Another month could mean no job to go back too😕

I would argue that this is a bit of a smoke screen. I think they just want to lockdown for another month and using this as a kind of 'sweetener' as in 'look we are doing you a favour'.

I just don't see how a better Xmas can result in another lockdown and people think its a good idea?
People meeting up for Christmas is likely to lead to a worse lockdown. Its obvious really
 
Good quote from someone at public health England today
’You really want a happy Xmas with your family then go on to bury some of them in Jan/Feb’?
 
We have a number of elderly neighbours, in fact 4 in a row over the road from us .................... we speak to them on the front regularly and they all have the same attitude as your Dad. That doesn't mean they are having swinging parties but it is noticeable their siblings are checking on them regular.

I think the first lockdown, everyone thought we'll do this and it'll be sorted, but now the elderly are thinking balls to this as i could be wasting the last months, years of my life holed up with no-one to even share my memories with.

It's a travesty that it has come to this and for everyone with this attitude, their will be another who won't even step over the door as they have been terrified to the point that they think the virus will attack them as soon as they go over the threshold.

I'm not advocating that their should be no restrictions, just that there is an awful lot of people who the lockdown has had minimal effect, being judge & jury on those who are really struggling both mentally & financially.

Rant over, but my heart breaks for the older people living alone.
Not a rant Nate, it is the truth.
 
Family's will meet up for Xmas and frankly what can they do to stop it??

It's going to happen no matter what they have in place. Is it 'worth it' for another 25 day lockdown. Is it f*ck!!

Are we seriously saying so that family's can have a dinner and pass presents we should shut shops / gyms and pubs etc for another month? How many people does this effect financially? Another month could mean no job to go back too😕

I would argue that this is a bit of a smoke screen. I think they just want to lockdown for another month and using this as a kind of 'sweetener' as in 'look we are doing you a favour'.

I just don't see how a better Xmas can result in another lockdown and people think its a good idea?

why do you believe that "they" want another lockdown so desperately ?
 
Whichever way it goes it's safe to say there won't be many doing Dry January this time round
 
I don't really think Christmas is primarily about grown adults is it. So we can all sit here and say its a no from me.

But the bigger picture is that is it about young children and getting close family together.

Young children have had a hell of a year and those that still believe will lose the magic and then those with wider family that they haven't seen and may never see again need an opportunity to get together.

As a grown adult it matters not to me but looking at the bigger picture it matters a lot.
 
I think there's also someting we are missing here. And that's what the cases look like in five weeks.

It might be that regardless of how numbers decline (if they do) that the government decide to keep lock down going for another 2-3 weeks, right up until Christmas.

If that's the case and we're seeing cases around the 2-3k per day, its a completely different conversation to the one we are having now with 20k avg per day.

I'd like to think today will be a BIG drop from last Thursday's 33k, which will put us into a net decline for the past 7 days, hopefully something which continues over the next 2 weeks.
 
I guess it’s one of those things that until you personally have to do it then some people will remain flippant about the dangers.

Grown adults know the danger that this virus can bring, especially to the aged and vunerable, but this type of rhetoric we've constantly heard from the 'experts' is far too abrasive and going back to what I said earlier in this thread, we've got people who think that if they take one step out of the door they will instantly be attacked by this virus like something out of a Harry f***ing Potter film.
 
Good quote from someone at public health England today
’You really want a happy Xmas with your family then go on to bury some of them in Jan/Feb’?
Funny you should write that, I was in my workshop today and overheard a passer bye say exactly the same thing - we can have mum round for Christmas but could bury her in February. A bit of a sobering thought.
 
I wonder if they restrict the gathering to say 6 people?? We have already made a plan based on this, to ensure, everyone ends up having a small gathering, I just can’t see them allowing a limitless free for all, maybe some middle ground.
 
I'm not at all surprised.

In fact I'm looking forward to the defense of SAGE from the usual suspects. That story isn't just been reported in the mail either before folks use that as a stick to beat up the story with.

Everything we were told in March was an outright lie. Everything.

Yup, SAGE is an absolute joke. Little virology/immunology input. Staggeringly inept "models", epidemiologists who thought the peak of the virus (a coronavirus) was going to be in June! F**king June! I believed all this back in the spring until I did just a little bit of research when things started to get really weird in the summer (mask mandate, in summer?)

The country has lost its mind. People have been deliberately frightened. Its an absolute disgrace.

Abandoning all previous advice for respiratory epidemics from the WHO (e.g. track and trace - not advised as no evidence of benefit) yet trying to implement a track and trace system by siphoning off BILLIONS of public money. Track and trace a respiratory virus that was circulating before we had a test prepared?! Unreal. Cat..... chasing..... tail.

I think I got called evil on another thread (I will get round to replying to that!) for pointing out that current excess deaths are not massively out of the ordinary for this time of year, they aren't (I'll post elsewhere on Nov numbers). "Cases" were falling before further restrictions were introduced across many cities (even one of my city Labour MPs acknowledged this in correspondence yet they will still vote for more restrictions!). SAGE then pushed out those ludicrous (yes, utterly ludicrous) graphs showing a crazy number of deaths per day that simply was never going to happen. The SAGE data was pushed without challenge or scrutiny.

Pointless mass testing of children in Liverpool (with cases already falling) using a new (apparently fairly useful lateral flow test) when such tests could actually have been used in care homes to allow residents who have been locked away for months to see relatives. I don't understand how more people are not outraged. Clearly some on here are.

1605840442213.png

There have been restrictions put in place (many of which Chris Whitty has explained in public lectures have absolutely no impact against a highly infectious respiratory virus), modelers calling for NPI's which make little (if any) difference over the long term. We have had mathematicians on independent SAGE banging on about cases/deaths doubling every x number of days without any fundamental understanding that such doubling will not just carry on going (like it didn't in the spring) if there is not an endless number of, sadly, susceptible people. There have been "global health" academics harping on about "zero covid" for the UK (it is difficult for me to contain my rage at them)..... the list goes on. What a sorry mess.

Plotting the actual data, not modeling, is always highly informative. The deaths per million follow a very very similar shape and timing for the European countries. Almost as though this is a natural phenomena which passes through a population and, sadly, kills those most susceptible..........................

1605838880708.png

The czech republic did manage to "contain" the virus in spring so I'm sure people will say we could have done the same. If we had shut done the country in Jan/Feb then maybe (but who would have advocated that?). However, look at the Czech's. Once endemic you can't contain it and they have just pushed their deaths into the autumn.

As randy has mentioned elsewhere, you can't "control the virus" yet we have politicians spouting utterly meaningless phrases like "circuit breaker" and "fire break".

We have had epidemics before and will have them again. If we hadn't had it sweep through in spring and it wasn't all over the media the current levels would hardly be noticed in most of the country. For all the gnashing of teeth regarding Sweden they followed the accepted pandemic guidelines after their epidemiologists assessed the data (and dismissed Ferguson's predictions). They kept their economy open to an extent, kept some level of socialising going, didn't madate masks, didn't stick pointless signs everywhere and "queue here" bo**ocks stickers on the floor etc. They informed their citizens and treated them like adults. You really should ask why we (and other western nations) have seemingly thrown in the trash the usual pandemic response which it looked like we were going to carry out at one stage.

We currently seem to have SAGE running the country and not the government. Their advisors (Ferguson, Farrar etc) are all over the media telling us to behave and we may be let out for Christmas. This will continue until either people/business has had enough or SAGE call an end to it.



A quote I read somewhere:

"The governments response to coronavirus is akin to dealing with a fly in the kitchen by burning the house down"
 
Furlough scheme extended until the end of March. I doubt that would be the case unless more lockdowns were already expected, regardless of Christmas.

That said, I think the Govt are damned if they do, damned if they don't with this one. If they tried to ban Christmas there would be equally indignant outrage as if we have a 'window' off, and lockdown again.

Loads of people would ignore the rules over Christmas anyway, so possibly more sensible to kind of make it official.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top