It's funny, that wasn't even one ounce of my consideration in any of the previous posts, obviously plays a part in some peoples eyes though, no idea why its even relevant?
Or people are so biased against Eddie Hearns fighters ?
At market odds? What are the odds anyway?I’d be happy to have a bet for charity that Fury beats Joshua if anyone interested?
Not at all, I pay zero attention to the promoters and had to actually look up who's Fury and Wilders were, basically as I had forgot/ not been interested in that at all. I didn't even realise Whyte was Hearn, as is Parker and Usyk. Not fussed/ don't care.Because I read yours and some other's posts and I wonder whether you have gotten caught up in the Sky media hype. Overrating AJ's opponents many of who are Hearn fighters and down playing anything that Fury and Wilder have achieved.
And then coming out with things like Wilder is scared, its almost like its copied and pasted from an Eddie Hearn interview.
Not really, I think AJ and Fury are great. I think Wilder is still a very dangerous fighter.
Below them you've the second tier of people like Ruiz, Whyte, Parker etc.
Thats giving a balanced view of Hearn and non Hearn fighters. I'm not writing off AJs opponents, calling anyone a bum, or calling any professional fighter scared.
No idea it’s just for charity. Loser gives £25 to charity of winners choosing.At market odds? What are the odds anyway?
You can't class yourself as elite unless you've beaten someone elite. Wilder has beaten no one he isn't and never was elite. Fury and AJ have both beaten KlitschkoJoshua's record is better on paper because he's beaten more fighters from the second tier, people like Parker, Whyte etc. However if you are evaluating a fight then surely you've got to look at how AJ and Fury have looked against the absolute elite. Forget how poor Fury looks against poor fighters because he raises his game when he's fighting someone dangerous.
that tells you more about the ranking systems than anything else. How on earth you can be ranked so high having fought no one is beyond me. You can add Usyk into that, two unconvincing fights at heavy and he's suddenly number one contender??Wilder was ranked above everyone mentioned on this thread apart from AJ and Fury before the Fury second fight... and that was with everyone's knowledge about his limitations.
Wilder is at fault, he chose the easier fight against Fury, it's on record him saying he turned down more money from AJ to fight a half fit Fury. It's Wilder that ducked, no one else.Obviously the Joshua fight is the big one but I think both fighters and promoters on both sides were at fault for that. Even AJ has admitted as such.
Remind me who Whyte had beat when AJ beat him? That list you made is properly laughable.Yes, it is, Wilder has zero record at all, he's beaten no one of note ever. He hasn't beaten a former world champ with a defence, he has boxed 2 top 10 ranked fighters Ortiz and Fury, a total of 18 rounds completed against Fury and 15 against Ortiz and he objectively lost 75%+ of those rounds.
Wilder is a bum, Whyte is a much better boxer and Wilder has dodged hi for about 3 years.
Sure, I'll have a £25 quid charity bet, although I can see how Fury could win, I have AJ marginal fave.I’d be happy to have a bet for charity that Fury beats Joshua if anyone interested?
Haha, my point has always been the odds are likely unreasonably in Fury's favour, which you've done exactly that just there, by basically trying to give an evens bet when Joshua's odds are around 2.5 with the bookies, and Fury's are 1.5.No idea it’s just for charity. Loser gives £25 to charity of winners choosing.
If he believes what he's saying he should give market odds, that's the point of the argument, or the point of mine anyway.Sure, I'll have a £25 quid charity bet, although I can see how Fury could win, I have AJ marginal fave.
that's a fair pointIf he believes what he's saying he should give market odds, that's the point of the argument, or the point of mine anyway.
like I said, mate you might be able to argue either way with a few of them, but the gist is correct.I'm actually in tears at that list, Wilder is a bum because "he never beat anyone" but Andy Ruiz Jr is the 3rd hardest fight despite beating who? Alexander Dimitrenko? The ghost of Kevin Johnson?
You can't go off record and then decide you want to go off ability when it suits. Wilder is the 3rd hardest fight on the list or he should be anyway, Fury vs Klitschko being 1st and AJ beating Klitschko being 2nd.
If he believes what he's saying he should give market odds, that's the point of the argument, or the point of mine anyway.
that's a fair point
Tougher yes, more difficult fight? No, not at all.like I said, mate you might be able to argue either way with a few of them, but the gist is correct.
Ruiz by the way, only ever been on his butt once and got up and won. He's a far tougher nut than the spaghetti legged windmiller who claims he was beaten by a sci-fi cos-play outfit