The end?

Does your mate have any info/comment on this story? It sounds like one he might be particularly interested in.

Nato jets intercept Russian spy plane over Sweden

@Liamo Apparently this happened several days ago. The Russian plane didn't even get close to Swedish air space, because, if it had, Gripens would have blown it out of the sky. Swedish airforce has a shoot to kill policy with any Russian military aircraft in its airspace. Anyway, the Germans got to it first .... being a bit closer.
 
Some "on the ground" update for you all. I've redacted some of it for obvious reasons.

"Russia
The floodings are striking hard, among the things gone is the Kurganmeshzavodsk, Russias main APC plant.
It is now 2.5 meters under water, and it is believed to take between 3-6 months to get back up and running by Western standards, but with sanctions and lack of manpower it might take considerably longer.

The KMZ produces 50ish of the BMP/BRTs per months, so as a minimum this means 150-300 APCs that will never be built, and with a rate of destruction of about 35 destroyed per day this is just an increase of the downward spiral for Russia.

In regards of the refineries that have been blown up.
The worst hit ones have started to fire their staff.
This sort of implies that Russia does not think they will ever be able to get them back up and running.
Que Happy Budanov Noises, this means that Ukraine over time has a real shot at dunking out all the fuel of Russia as more longrange drones come into play.

What Airdefence Doing?
A while ago the Russian government told the oil companies that they are on their own in regards of air defence systems, and that they have to get their own, and pay for them themselves.
Now, let us look aside to how weakened Russia must be to have to resort to that...

Let us instead ponder what happens when immensely wealthy companies are told that the army is not able to provide air defence systems and staff them, and that they have to get their own systems.
From where would they get those systems since all of them in Russia are guarding air bases and the frontlines in Ukraine?
After all, it is not like Rozneftegaz can order up some from the West.

Entire companies of AD has therefore just "dissappeared" from frontlines and bases as they have gone to guard the refineries etcetera, with their officers pocketing millions of dollars.
Nothing like good old corruption, what on Earth did they think would happen?

Ridonculouser
I wholeheartedly claim that this is a word, it sure does cover the next tidbit well.
The Russian Government have ordered the authorities in the border regions of Bilhorod, Bryansk, Kursk, Rostov and Voronezh to arrange their own air defence, thank you very much.
Not being able to source that themselves, nor having the money to bribe generals with, they kicked the problem downwards.

So, there is now a new law in those regions ordering the local agro-business to bolt air defence systems to all farming equipment to shoot down drones.
Uhm... yeah you read that right, farmers will go to prison if they do not bolt down an "air defence system" on their tractors and combine harvesters, and staff said guns.

As you ponder a tractor with a bolted on Mosin-Nagant rifle on the roof with a dude manning it, out plowing endless fields... do you now understand why we need the word ridonculous?
Imagine that poor sap hanging on for dear life as the tractor slews from side to side spreading manure with a dude firing against ever more hightech drones going past on bombing runs?

Bilhorod
There's intercepted calls and data from the Russian side indicating that they are most impressed with the 52 percent lethality rate among themselves.
Local health care have broken down since all hospitals have been commandered in Bilhorod, Kursk, Bryansk to treat the wounded from the heavy ongoing battles.
Officially the Free Russians have left Bilhorod, inofficially not so much, and the artillery barrages and dronings continue nonstop.

The Free Russians have though been rotated out since they have been there the longest.
Other international brigades and battalions is now there fighting.
Among those is the Nordic Battalion constituting mostly of Swedes, many of them are my previous SOG boys that opted to stay.
Sadly one of my boys fell in battle about a week ago in the region.

Like all Swedish soldiers he is brought under honour guard by the 21st to Poltava to be buried there on sacred Swedish land, next to Camp Sweden.
The Nordic Battalion is seconded to the 21st for natural reasons.

Why is it sacred Swedish land?
Poltava is where the last serious attempt of Sweden to crush Russia ended, it was a close run affair, and in retrospect the world would have been a very different place if we had won that battle.
So, all Swedes that fall in Ukraine are now buried on the battlefield of Poltava to honour what has been.
Until 2 years ago we did not speak with foreigners about our aversion to Russia, to not look like raving loons, but history proved us right, we did indeed know our neighbour.
Anyway...

Fonts & Lackings
Let us start with Ukrainian "Lackings".
Regardless of what pundits and the US may believe, Ukraine is no longer lacking shells.
No, what is getting scarce is air defence, Ukraine need more systems and missiles, especially pressing is the need for 7 more Patriot Systems.
It can't be expressed what a difference that would make at this point in the war.

Yesterday the EU Parliamentarian got up and fired off the speech of this war.
It was fire and brimstone on a level not heard since "On the beaches", if not even more powerful.
He got the Parliament to refuse to send the EU Budget onwards to the Council unless the council transfers 7 Patriot Systems to Ukraine, basically deadlocking EU into acting.

The difference between EU and US has never been clearer, an overwhelming majority voted for this, and the 7 Patriot Systems are now top of the Agenda in Strasbourg, and will be sent.
And they say that there are no true leaders or politicians left, but that is not true, they are just all in Brussels...
14 billion euros! That's commitment.

(21) Guy Verhofstadt on X: "BREAKING — Parliament refuses discharge of the Council budget until European Council decided to support Ukraine with additional Patriot anti-missile systems ! https://t.co/zDvA4xyUct" / X (twitter.com)

Russian Lackings on the Fonts
Russia is still gaining about two fields per day in all of Ukraine.
There are roughly 35 000 fields remaining in Ukrainian hands in Eastern Ukraine, that means that at the going rate Russia will have taken everything East of Dniepro in 17 500 days, or in 48 years.
Ukraine is very big, remember that the next time people talk about Russian gains.
And each of those fields cost Russia an incredible amount of equipment and soldiers.

I normally state that Russia will never run out of soldiers, but that is not entirely true, they will do that in about 8 years at the going pace, and after that they will send the women...
And at that point Ukraine will be without soldiers too.

No, it is not soldiers that will win the war, it is heavy equipment and production of consumables.
Right now roughly 60 percent of Russias enormous stockpile of arms are used up, and the refurbishment and bringing back to life of old equipment is not keeping up with demand as it takes longer and longer time to fix stuff up.
And the Russian heavy equipment arms production is like putting lipstick on a nuclear powerplant to make it look sexy.

First, let me state that Russia still have enormous equipment resources in play in Ukraine, but they are now well on the gliding slope downwards.
And that is creating more and more interesting "Lackings" locally along the frontline.

There is a general lack of APCs, but Russia are so far able to solve that somewhat by being creative.
They strap more soldiers to what the APCs they have, and use tanks increasingly as APCs.
And when that is not enough they use Buhankas (Scooby Doo vans), chinese golf carts, and civilian cars and motorcycles.
We see this along the entirety of the frontline now, so it is probably the part of the equipment ladder that is having the heaviest toll now on Russian combat power.

In regards of tanks we can deduce that Russia still have enough of them to use them as makeshift APCs like this.
But, now and then small parts of the frontline run out of them, right now they are transfering in new ones at Avdiivka due to all of them being expended.

We are now starting to see a spreading lack of artillery on almost all sectors of the frontline.
Where there should be four pieces, there are 1 or 2, and we also see places entirely without them for short durations until new ancient systems are brought in.
Most often this bringing in is done fairly rapidly to avoid Ukraine taking advantage of it.

But, now we have seen an entire sector run out of artillery systems for 48 hours.
And we are not talking about some backwater place, no we are talking about Avdiivka.
Russia sent in several massive tank-APC meat charges in this direction, completely out of both artillery and air support.
Those massive attacks was mercilessly crushed by Ukrainian artillery and waves of drones.

The reason was that there was not a single piece of artillery, nor a single Air Defence System.
And without air defence the Russian air force will not fly.
In the end Russia ran out of both tanks and APC on top of the missing artillery and air defences.
So, during the last 24 of those 48 hours Russia just sent wave after wave of running Russians, aided by a few Buhankas and golf carts.

This came so unexpectedly that Ukraine did not have the time to swing in enough heavy units to take the full advantage of the collapsed frontline.
The reason is that it was unexpected, and also that this is Rasputitsa and the Sector Commanders have sent their heavy stuff back for servicing and reconstitutions.

Let us just say that Tank Girl exploded at the news of this missed opportunity.
She ripped a new interestingly placed hole to defecate out of in Every general in Eastern Ukraine.
She got away with it due to being absolutely and 100 percent correct, you just can't make such mistakes during a war.
Now everyone understands that she will personally strangle each commander that is not ready to counter-punch on the fly from now on, and changes are being made.

Thankfully the damage done was small, and we are fairly certain that new opportunities like this will happen again at a slowly increasing rate, and next time the other generals will be ready for it.

Anyway, my point is that these "lackings" will multiply ever so slowly from now on.
And those traded fields are meaningless for Russia in the end, all that is needed is a big "Lackings" to happen at a good spot for an offensive, and fields will fall back extremely profusely and rapidly.

After all, that is why we are grinding away at a steady pace, to create those lackings, one after another.
And all we in Europe need to do is to hang on and produce more and more consumables and weapons, while applying pressure politically and by showing the Will to Fight.

Camp *******
More and more videos are coming out of Parachutistes from The French Foreign Legion gliding around looking incredibly deadly and competent, and somehow there are more of them than ever before.
There's also an increasing number of Winged Dagger dudes together with Dagger & Parachute emblems drinking tea and eating mint sauce.

The Sword & Star guys missed the memo and thought the directions said that they should go to Poltava...
Somehow the Winged Arrows also meandered into Camp Sweden grumbling about the lack of proper White and Blue flags.
And finally the Winged Parachute Daggers are eating pasta East of Odesa, Odesan ladies are most impressed with them as they walk about here.

Theres more of them, but these are for now the most numerous detachments.
And nobody is surprised that the Swedes and Finns misplaced themselves in Poltava due to its holy status in our countries.
The Combined Armies of Finland-Sweden in Poltava... pure historic importance sniffles...
Also, it is highly likely that the Russians will just think they are new versions of Tank Girl's boys since they flew Swedish flags since day one and named their camp into Camp Sweden as a thank you to Sweden for the gear and training.
A few from the Baltics showed up in Camp ***** and asked where the Finns and Swedes was, and hearing where they had gone they swore and diverted themselves to Poltava.

Oh, I forgot...
Over at Lviv there are some impressive Grunting Kurwa Noises emanating, there's supposedly some dutch intermingled into that mix together with various Belgian languages.

Still just the vanguard, but it is slowly increasing now.
The big units will constitute in Romania, and drive in that way.
Well, except the Poles that are of the opinion that they have a better border to cross.

And, there's now 200 RAF personel in Romania together with 5 Typhoon's performing air policing of Western Black Sea.
The Russians just sighed depressedly and moved over as some suspicious Dagger with 2 Blue Wave dudes set up shop in those gas platforms in the middle of the Sea to eat sandwiches with Sallad Cream and some Spotted d*ck with their tea.
I heard that the Union Jack is looking quite impressive from those platforms.
Russia no like, but Russia staying the hell away from them now, after all those platforms are on international waters, and as such it is up to whomever wish to create a mini-nation on them.
After all, someone did that to UK and set up a principality on one of their abandoned air defence platforms.

Political pressure, and showing of will, it goes a long way to slowly press Russia back.
And yes, there are now AWACS flying there, in what is increasingly becoming Free Nato Waters.
Much Sad Russia Noises are thusly produced."
 
Are there many available, or just the one? Might be a significant addition.

As I understand it they are going into production, fast tracked.... so there will be a trickle through the year. My mate thinks between 1 and 3 months each. He saw the prototype being tested. Said it scorched his retina ... which might be an unfortunate side effect, people looking at the explosion.
 
Are there many available, or just the one? Might be a significant addition.

I can now answer this. Ukraine asked for 10. They meant "emitters".
The EU has added 10 systems (8 emitters each) to their order from the UK.
In field tests (in Ukraine) it had a 99% hit rate on drones (according to my pal). He reckons it's also effective against mortars.
Production is, I'm told, underway.
 
Question about EU if that’s ok.

When he references EU and Friend it strikes me as problematic due to states like Ireland/Cyprus and Austria being non NATO members and not signing up to the EU defence terms.

Are these guys actually in anyway helping the bloc or are they like Hungary & Slovakia dragging their feet.

Tbh apart from cash not sure how these countries could help.
 
On the middle east .... opinion piece

"First of all, I think that both sides are massive dinguses, and the same goes for Hamas.
That is why I do not write about it normally.
As a professional soldier my opinion is that I avoid grey scale wars, I much prefer more clearcut scenarios.
Like for instance the Second Congo War, and the war in Ukraine.
I prefer my good versus evil wars, less moral ambiguity, and I have an easier time to retain my "soul" as such.
Hence why I would not participate in the Middle Eastern War.

Also, to understand them one must step far out of the usual reference frame for a westerner and deeply understand the middle East, otherwise you will just produce a long line of stepping into the proverbial piles of ****.
Due to having a long list of friends from all sides of the current conflict I do have the background from all sides.

Background
First of all, the entire middle east is embroiled in a religious cold war between Sunni and Shia muslims, everything must be seen from this perspective.
Both sides are trying to keep it as a cold war for now, so they go for "cudos" to recruit followers to this side, and cudos is gained by being anuses to the West mainly.

Hence al-Qaida and IS striking western targets as a chest-thumping exercise, look how hard we are.
And same goes for Iran and their proxies like the Hezbollah.

None of them truly give a **** about the West, nor Israel, except when we are stupid and go to one of our usual wars in the region against them.
And, I would even go so far as to say that the only thing we accomplish is to delay the religious cold war from going into a hot war by interfering all the time.

And the reason we interfere all the time is spelled oil, so the faster we wean ourselves of oil the better really.
Because we are feeding money at the same time into the grandiose muppets leading said countries, further propagating the conflicts.

This is why I always propagate the line that we should stop using oil as much as is possible, both for the environment, and to defund their endless internal conflicts that all the time spill over unto us due to our hunger for oil.

Iran vs Israel
Let us start with Israel attacking the Iranian legation in Syria.
It was a very clearcut war crime, in fact, attacking Embassies is the first point of order of international "nono's".
So much so that this was the first time a state has been so ****ed up in the head that they have done it intentionally.

Israel claim that it was a front for the Revolutionary Guard Council (RGC).
Something that might even be half-true, after all there was high ranking officers inside the Embassy at the time of it being blown up.

It does not matter one iota that they were there, it is still a war crime of the first order, regardless of those being legit targets, or not.
But, let us play.
Were they legit targets?
Nope, there is no state of war between Iran and Israel, as such Istael murdered them.
But, murdering officers is not a war crime as such.

So, in other words, if Israel had whacked them on the street, or in their hotel, it would sort of been okay.
After all, Iran is funding and arming Hezbollah that is currently lobbing missiles on Israel.
It is the Embassy part that is the key issue here, the rest is superflous, and Iran would probably have been argumentative and sent some more weapons to Hezbollah if it had been done at a hotel or some such.

But, Israel in their collective governmental lunacy had to give Iran a very clearcut reason to directly strike against Israel.
And that gave Iran the right to defend themselves, up to the point of a direct war against Israel.

People forget that proxies does not truly count between states, annoying but still a fact.
It is not until a state attacks the territory of another state, that it is counted as a war.
And an Embassy is the territory of another state.
As such Israel attacked the territory of Iran, turning it into a direct war/conflict between states.

Brief detour, with Hamas attacking Israel it was the state of Palestine that attacked Israel, so that too is a war, and that gave Israel the right to defend themselves.
It is from that point that things got wonky as Israel clearly went beyond anything that could be called a "measured response".
Detour over.

Iran
Having had their territory they faced having had their state attacked by another state, and a state of war was clearly in effect.
Iran never wanted a direct war with Israel, they know that this is something that they potentially would utterly fail in, and the entire state of Iran could get invaded, and on top of that the government could topple.

Israel here clearly wanted to push things to the brink of a war, or even beyond the brink, to pull in support for their war against Palestine, Hamas, Hesbollah, etcetera.
It is even possible that Israel wanted their "Iranian Problem" solved permanently by causing a direct war between Iran and the US.

Anyway, Iran now had a huge problem on their hand.
If they did not respond they would lose massive cudos in the all important religious cold war, and that would probably get them attacked directly by the Sunni side as they smelled blood in the water.
The loss of cudos would also make them lose face towards their proxies, primarily the houthi's and Hezbollah.
No, they needed to strike back.

Diplomacy
Within hours after the idiotic Israeli attack on the Embassy the US started to pressure Israel hard.
And the EU started to pressure Iran hard.
At the same time both the US and EU realised that Israel had ****ed up.

US mainly pushed for Israel not doing more stupid attacks, and to not escalate as the Iranian answer arrived.
EU pushed for Iran not overdoing their attack.
It was all that the two powers could do in this situation.

The Attack
After days of tooth-gnashing Iran struck with 300ish drones and missiles, spread out over several waves, fired from several directions.
From the standpoint of a professional soldier looking on at what happened in real time, it was a spectacular show, but not a serious attack.
It gave cudos, but not enough to start a hot war.
I would go so far as to say that this was the most spectacular show of force as a non-attack as is humanly possible.

Since Iran did not want a war, but needed to show force and guts, they carefully planned and choreographed the entire thing to be near to breaking through the defences, or even hitting an Israeli military base.
At the same time they flagged the upcoming attack to high heavens, so much so that EU and US knew to the minute when it would start.

They then started by launching the drones before they launched the missiles, just to make certain that Israel had the time to set up their defences, and for the alliies of Israel to do their part and get involved.
And UK, Jordan and US did get involved in shoting down the drones and missiles outside Israeli territory.
Something that was made easier since they knew it was coming.

Also, the number was carefully calculated, Iran could have done 500 drones and missiles since that is their suspected simultaneous launch capacity.
Instead they nicely staggered 300, since even 300 might have broken through if launched in one wave of arrivals.

And, the "fist" of the attack was carefully plotted against a military base, and it broke through, but not hard enough to cause mass casualties, just enough to gain "cudos", and only one civilian was injured by falling debris, unknown if that was from AD or a shot down Shaheed.

As a show of force it was perfect, but as an attack it was an abysmal failure.
As a non-escalatory response it was perfect.

Now, let us park my **** as the planning commander, having gotten the order to perform a real attack, just to see the difference.
First of all, I would have been sneaky in readying my launches, I would have waited for a couple of more weeks, I would also have asked for the political side to start diplomatic talks directly to "fakely deescalate" things.

The attack would have been done with 50 ballistic missiles covering for the launch of 300 shaheeds.
Those 50 would have mainly been aimed at depleting and weakening the AD.
At set times I would have launched 100 cruise missiles and later 50 more ballistic missiles, all timed to get 450 missiles of various types and drones to strike within minutes of each other, that would have totally overwhelmed the Israeli iron-dome and any allied responses if there would even have been any.

Instead, we got this carefully flagged, timed, and choreographed attack, perfectly executed to almost be totally intercepted.
I will give it to the Iranians, I do not think I could have executed their orders better.

Israel
Now the ball resides with Israel.
They got attacked via an attack that everyone knows was staged perfectly to not be escalatory, after a war crime attack on an Embassy.
What will they do now?

It was "ineffectual" enough that they could shrug it off entirely.
Or they could make a similar token strike.

Who am I kidding here, Israel will walk full hog into the trap that they set themselves.
They wanted a war to begin with, so they will do something truly outrageous to provoke the Iranians to do a proper attack in self-defence.
For Netanyahu last night was a total failure, and he will not take the opportunity to claim it as a victory for the Israeli Iron Dome.

So, expect Israel to go full on bananas.
So, what to expect?
Remember that he was full willing to order up a war crime, so the sky is probably the limit, in a very literal sense.

One obvious option would be to attack Teheran directly to try to take out the leadership of Iran.
Another option would be to bomb the Bushehr NPP causing as much nuclear fallout as possible over Iran to try to make it uninhabitable.
Yet another is to use a nuke in EMP-mode to take out electronics in Iran, this has even been directly talked about even prior to the Iranian attack, as a response to the then expected attack.

Netanyahu
Currently Netanyahu is the single most dangerous individual on the planet.
He is making Putin and Kim yo-Jong look level headed, and in comparison the Ayatollah's in Iran look downright rational.
Something of an achievement.

Right now he seems hellbent on starting the big war in the middle east that nobody with a sane mind ever wanted.
If he get what he wants we will see tens of millions of refugees, world economy blown to ****, a potential nuclear war, and he just do not give a **** since he does not want to loose power so he must go to prison.

Heaven help us all.
If the US had been the "Good Ol' USA" this would never have happened.
It will take decades to clean up this mess, if there even is anything to clean up when "Bibi" is done."
 
Question about EU if that’s ok.

When he references EU and Friend it strikes me as problematic due to states like Ireland/Cyprus and Austria being non NATO members and not signing up to the EU defence terms.

Are these guys actually in anyway helping the bloc or are they like Hungary & Slovakia dragging their feet.

Tbh apart from cash not sure how these countries could help.

I will ask, but I suspect that they are peripheral at best.
 
On the middle east .... opinion piece

"First of all, I think that both sides are massive dinguses, and the same goes for Hamas.
That is why I do not write about it normally.
As a professional soldier my opinion is that I avoid grey scale wars, I much prefer more clearcut scenarios.
Like for instance the Second Congo War, and the war in Ukraine.
I prefer my good versus evil wars, less moral ambiguity, and I have an easier time to retain my "soul" as such.
Hence why I would not participate in the Middle Eastern War.

Also, to understand them one must step far out of the usual reference frame for a westerner and deeply understand the middle East, otherwise you will just produce a long line of stepping into the proverbial piles of ****.
Due to having a long list of friends from all sides of the current conflict I do have the background from all sides.

Background
First of all, the entire middle east is embroiled in a religious cold war between Sunni and Shia muslims, everything must be seen from this perspective.
Both sides are trying to keep it as a cold war for now, so they go for "cudos" to recruit followers to this side, and cudos is gained by being anuses to the West mainly.

Hence al-Qaida and IS striking western targets as a chest-thumping exercise, look how hard we are.
And same goes for Iran and their proxies like the Hezbollah.

None of them truly give a **** about the West, nor Israel, except when we are stupid and go to one of our usual wars in the region against them.
And, I would even go so far as to say that the only thing we accomplish is to delay the religious cold war from going into a hot war by interfering all the time.

And the reason we interfere all the time is spelled oil, so the faster we wean ourselves of oil the better really.
Because we are feeding money at the same time into the grandiose muppets leading said countries, further propagating the conflicts.

This is why I always propagate the line that we should stop using oil as much as is possible, both for the environment, and to defund their endless internal conflicts that all the time spill over unto us due to our hunger for oil.

Iran vs Israel
Let us start with Israel attacking the Iranian legation in Syria.
It was a very clearcut war crime, in fact, attacking Embassies is the first point of order of international "nono's".
So much so that this was the first time a state has been so ****ed up in the head that they have done it intentionally.

Israel claim that it was a front for the Revolutionary Guard Council (RGC).
Something that might even be half-true, after all there was high ranking officers inside the Embassy at the time of it being blown up.

It does not matter one iota that they were there, it is still a war crime of the first order, regardless of those being legit targets, or not.
But, let us play.
Were they legit targets?
Nope, there is no state of war between Iran and Israel, as such Istael murdered them.
But, murdering officers is not a war crime as such.

So, in other words, if Israel had whacked them on the street, or in their hotel, it would sort of been okay.
After all, Iran is funding and arming Hezbollah that is currently lobbing missiles on Israel.
It is the Embassy part that is the key issue here, the rest is superflous, and Iran would probably have been argumentative and sent some more weapons to Hezbollah if it had been done at a hotel or some such.

But, Israel in their collective governmental lunacy had to give Iran a very clearcut reason to directly strike against Israel.
And that gave Iran the right to defend themselves, up to the point of a direct war against Israel.

People forget that proxies does not truly count between states, annoying but still a fact.
It is not until a state attacks the territory of another state, that it is counted as a war.
And an Embassy is the territory of another state.
As such Israel attacked the territory of Iran, turning it into a direct war/conflict between states.

Brief detour, with Hamas attacking Israel it was the state of Palestine that attacked Israel, so that too is a war, and that gave Israel the right to defend themselves.
It is from that point that things got wonky as Israel clearly went beyond anything that could be called a "measured response".
Detour over.

Iran
Having had their territory they faced having had their state attacked by another state, and a state of war was clearly in effect.
Iran never wanted a direct war with Israel, they know that this is something that they potentially would utterly fail in, and the entire state of Iran could get invaded, and on top of that the government could topple.

Israel here clearly wanted to push things to the brink of a war, or even beyond the brink, to pull in support for their war against Palestine, Hamas, Hesbollah, etcetera.
It is even possible that Israel wanted their "Iranian Problem" solved permanently by causing a direct war between Iran and the US.

Anyway, Iran now had a huge problem on their hand.
If they did not respond they would lose massive cudos in the all important religious cold war, and that would probably get them attacked directly by the Sunni side as they smelled blood in the water.
The loss of cudos would also make them lose face towards their proxies, primarily the houthi's and Hezbollah.
No, they needed to strike back.

Diplomacy
Within hours after the idiotic Israeli attack on the Embassy the US started to pressure Israel hard.
And the EU started to pressure Iran hard.
At the same time both the US and EU realised that Israel had ****ed up.

US mainly pushed for Israel not doing more stupid attacks, and to not escalate as the Iranian answer arrived.
EU pushed for Iran not overdoing their attack.
It was all that the two powers could do in this situation.

The Attack
After days of tooth-gnashing Iran struck with 300ish drones and missiles, spread out over several waves, fired from several directions.
From the standpoint of a professional soldier looking on at what happened in real time, it was a spectacular show, but not a serious attack.
It gave cudos, but not enough to start a hot war.
I would go so far as to say that this was the most spectacular show of force as a non-attack as is humanly possible.

Since Iran did not want a war, but needed to show force and guts, they carefully planned and choreographed the entire thing to be near to breaking through the defences, or even hitting an Israeli military base.
At the same time they flagged the upcoming attack to high heavens, so much so that EU and US knew to the minute when it would start.

They then started by launching the drones before they launched the missiles, just to make certain that Israel had the time to set up their defences, and for the alliies of Israel to do their part and get involved.
And UK, Jordan and US did get involved in shoting down the drones and missiles outside Israeli territory.
Something that was made easier since they knew it was coming.

Also, the number was carefully calculated, Iran could have done 500 drones and missiles since that is their suspected simultaneous launch capacity.
Instead they nicely staggered 300, since even 300 might have broken through if launched in one wave of arrivals.

And, the "fist" of the attack was carefully plotted against a military base, and it broke through, but not hard enough to cause mass casualties, just enough to gain "cudos", and only one civilian was injured by falling debris, unknown if that was from AD or a shot down Shaheed.

As a show of force it was perfect, but as an attack it was an abysmal failure.
As a non-escalatory response it was perfect.

Now, let us park my **** as the planning commander, having gotten the order to perform a real attack, just to see the difference.
First of all, I would have been sneaky in readying my launches, I would have waited for a couple of more weeks, I would also have asked for the political side to start diplomatic talks directly to "fakely deescalate" things.

The attack would have been done with 50 ballistic missiles covering for the launch of 300 shaheeds.
Those 50 would have mainly been aimed at depleting and weakening the AD.
At set times I would have launched 100 cruise missiles and later 50 more ballistic missiles, all timed to get 450 missiles of various types and drones to strike within minutes of each other, that would have totally overwhelmed the Israeli iron-dome and any allied responses if there would even have been any.

Instead, we got this carefully flagged, timed, and choreographed attack, perfectly executed to almost be totally intercepted.
I will give it to the Iranians, I do not think I could have executed their orders better.

Israel
Now the ball resides with Israel.
They got attacked via an attack that everyone knows was staged perfectly to not be escalatory, after a war crime attack on an Embassy.
What will they do now?

It was "ineffectual" enough that they could shrug it off entirely.
Or they could make a similar token strike.

Who am I kidding here, Israel will walk full hog into the trap that they set themselves.
They wanted a war to begin with, so they will do something truly outrageous to provoke the Iranians to do a proper attack in self-defence.
For Netanyahu last night was a total failure, and he will not take the opportunity to claim it as a victory for the Israeli Iron Dome.

So, expect Israel to go full on bananas.
So, what to expect?
Remember that he was full willing to order up a war crime, so the sky is probably the limit, in a very literal sense.

One obvious option would be to attack Teheran directly to try to take out the leadership of Iran.
Another option would be to bomb the Bushehr NPP causing as much nuclear fallout as possible over Iran to try to make it uninhabitable.
Yet another is to use a nuke in EMP-mode to take out electronics in Iran, this has even been directly talked about even prior to the Iranian attack, as a response to the then expected attack.

Netanyahu
Currently Netanyahu is the single most dangerous individual on the planet.
He is making Putin and Kim yo-Jong look level headed, and in comparison the Ayatollah's in Iran look downright rational.
Something of an achievement.

Right now he seems hellbent on starting the big war in the middle east that nobody with a sane mind ever wanted.
If he get what he wants we will see tens of millions of refugees, world economy blown to ****, a potential nuclear war, and he just do not give a **** since he does not want to loose power so he must go to prison.

Heaven help us all.
If the US had been the "Good Ol' USA" this would never have happened.
It will take decades to clean up this mess, if there even is anything to clean up when "Bibi" is done."
So basically, everything is ****ed. Cool.😭😱🤢😬🤣🙈🤬🤦‍♂️🤔😁
 
On the middle east .... opinion piece

"First of all, I think that both sides are massive dinguses, and the same goes for Hamas.
That is why I do not write about it normally.
As a professional soldier my opinion is that I avoid grey scale wars, I much prefer more clearcut scenarios.
Like for instance the Second Congo War, and the war in Ukraine.
I prefer my good versus evil wars, less moral ambiguity, and I have an easier time to retain my "soul" as such.
Hence why I would not participate in the Middle Eastern War.

Also, to understand them one must step far out of the usual reference frame for a westerner and deeply understand the middle East, otherwise you will just produce a long line of stepping into the proverbial piles of ****.
Due to having a long list of friends from all sides of the current conflict I do have the background from all sides.

Background
First of all, the entire middle east is embroiled in a religious cold war between Sunni and Shia muslims, everything must be seen from this perspective.
Both sides are trying to keep it as a cold war for now, so they go for "cudos" to recruit followers to this side, and cudos is gained by being anuses to the West mainly.

Hence al-Qaida and IS striking western targets as a chest-thumping exercise, look how hard we are.
And same goes for Iran and their proxies like the Hezbollah.

None of them truly give a **** about the West, nor Israel, except when we are stupid and go to one of our usual wars in the region against them.
And, I would even go so far as to say that the only thing we accomplish is to delay the religious cold war from going into a hot war by interfering all the time.

And the reason we interfere all the time is spelled oil, so the faster we wean ourselves of oil the better really.
Because we are feeding money at the same time into the grandiose muppets leading said countries, further propagating the conflicts.

This is why I always propagate the line that we should stop using oil as much as is possible, both for the environment, and to defund their endless internal conflicts that all the time spill over unto us due to our hunger for oil.

Iran vs Israel
Let us start with Israel attacking the Iranian legation in Syria.
It was a very clearcut war crime, in fact, attacking Embassies is the first point of order of international "nono's".
So much so that this was the first time a state has been so ****ed up in the head that they have done it intentionally.

Israel claim that it was a front for the Revolutionary Guard Council (RGC).
Something that might even be half-true, after all there was high ranking officers inside the Embassy at the time of it being blown up.

It does not matter one iota that they were there, it is still a war crime of the first order, regardless of those being legit targets, or not.
But, let us play.
Were they legit targets?
Nope, there is no state of war between Iran and Israel, as such Istael murdered them.
But, murdering officers is not a war crime as such.

So, in other words, if Israel had whacked them on the street, or in their hotel, it would sort of been okay.
After all, Iran is funding and arming Hezbollah that is currently lobbing missiles on Israel.
It is the Embassy part that is the key issue here, the rest is superflous, and Iran would probably have been argumentative and sent some more weapons to Hezbollah if it had been done at a hotel or some such.

But, Israel in their collective governmental lunacy had to give Iran a very clearcut reason to directly strike against Israel.
And that gave Iran the right to defend themselves, up to the point of a direct war against Israel.

People forget that proxies does not truly count between states, annoying but still a fact.
It is not until a state attacks the territory of another state, that it is counted as a war.
And an Embassy is the territory of another state.
As such Israel attacked the territory of Iran, turning it into a direct war/conflict between states.

Brief detour, with Hamas attacking Israel it was the state of Palestine that attacked Israel, so that too is a war, and that gave Israel the right to defend themselves.
It is from that point that things got wonky as Israel clearly went beyond anything that could be called a "measured response".
Detour over.

Iran
Having had their territory they faced having had their state attacked by another state, and a state of war was clearly in effect.
Iran never wanted a direct war with Israel, they know that this is something that they potentially would utterly fail in, and the entire state of Iran could get invaded, and on top of that the government could topple.

Israel here clearly wanted to push things to the brink of a war, or even beyond the brink, to pull in support for their war against Palestine, Hamas, Hesbollah, etcetera.
It is even possible that Israel wanted their "Iranian Problem" solved permanently by causing a direct war between Iran and the US.

Anyway, Iran now had a huge problem on their hand.
If they did not respond they would lose massive cudos in the all important religious cold war, and that would probably get them attacked directly by the Sunni side as they smelled blood in the water.
The loss of cudos would also make them lose face towards their proxies, primarily the houthi's and Hezbollah.
No, they needed to strike back.

Diplomacy
Within hours after the idiotic Israeli attack on the Embassy the US started to pressure Israel hard.
And the EU started to pressure Iran hard.
At the same time both the US and EU realised that Israel had ****ed up.

US mainly pushed for Israel not doing more stupid attacks, and to not escalate as the Iranian answer arrived.
EU pushed for Iran not overdoing their attack.
It was all that the two powers could do in this situation.

The Attack
After days of tooth-gnashing Iran struck with 300ish drones and missiles, spread out over several waves, fired from several directions.
From the standpoint of a professional soldier looking on at what happened in real time, it was a spectacular show, but not a serious attack.
It gave cudos, but not enough to start a hot war.
I would go so far as to say that this was the most spectacular show of force as a non-attack as is humanly possible.

Since Iran did not want a war, but needed to show force and guts, they carefully planned and choreographed the entire thing to be near to breaking through the defences, or even hitting an Israeli military base.
At the same time they flagged the upcoming attack to high heavens, so much so that EU and US knew to the minute when it would start.

They then started by launching the drones before they launched the missiles, just to make certain that Israel had the time to set up their defences, and for the alliies of Israel to do their part and get involved.
And UK, Jordan and US did get involved in shoting down the drones and missiles outside Israeli territory.
Something that was made easier since they knew it was coming.

Also, the number was carefully calculated, Iran could have done 500 drones and missiles since that is their suspected simultaneous launch capacity.
Instead they nicely staggered 300, since even 300 might have broken through if launched in one wave of arrivals.

And, the "fist" of the attack was carefully plotted against a military base, and it broke through, but not hard enough to cause mass casualties, just enough to gain "cudos", and only one civilian was injured by falling debris, unknown if that was from AD or a shot down Shaheed.

As a show of force it was perfect, but as an attack it was an abysmal failure.
As a non-escalatory response it was perfect.

Now, let us park my **** as the planning commander, having gotten the order to perform a real attack, just to see the difference.
First of all, I would have been sneaky in readying my launches, I would have waited for a couple of more weeks, I would also have asked for the political side to start diplomatic talks directly to "fakely deescalate" things.

The attack would have been done with 50 ballistic missiles covering for the launch of 300 shaheeds.
Those 50 would have mainly been aimed at depleting and weakening the AD.
At set times I would have launched 100 cruise missiles and later 50 more ballistic missiles, all timed to get 450 missiles of various types and drones to strike within minutes of each other, that would have totally overwhelmed the Israeli iron-dome and any allied responses if there would even have been any.

Instead, we got this carefully flagged, timed, and choreographed attack, perfectly executed to almost be totally intercepted.
I will give it to the Iranians, I do not think I could have executed their orders better.

Israel
Now the ball resides with Israel.
They got attacked via an attack that everyone knows was staged perfectly to not be escalatory, after a war crime attack on an Embassy.
What will they do now?

It was "ineffectual" enough that they could shrug it off entirely.
Or they could make a similar token strike.

Who am I kidding here, Israel will walk full hog into the trap that they set themselves.
They wanted a war to begin with, so they will do something truly outrageous to provoke the Iranians to do a proper attack in self-defence.
For Netanyahu last night was a total failure, and he will not take the opportunity to claim it as a victory for the Israeli Iron Dome.

So, expect Israel to go full on bananas.
So, what to expect?
Remember that he was full willing to order up a war crime, so the sky is probably the limit, in a very literal sense.

One obvious option would be to attack Teheran directly to try to take out the leadership of Iran.
Another option would be to bomb the Bushehr NPP causing as much nuclear fallout as possible over Iran to try to make it uninhabitable.
Yet another is to use a nuke in EMP-mode to take out electronics in Iran, this has even been directly talked about even prior to the Iranian attack, as a response to the then expected attack.

Netanyahu
Currently Netanyahu is the single most dangerous individual on the planet.
He is making Putin and Kim yo-Jong look level headed, and in comparison the Ayatollah's in Iran look downright rational.
Something of an achievement.

Right now he seems hellbent on starting the big war in the middle east that nobody with a sane mind ever wanted.
If he get what he wants we will see tens of millions of refugees, world economy blown to ****, a potential nuclear war, and he just do not give a **** since he does not want to loose power so he must go to prison.

Heaven help us all.
If the US had been the "Good Ol' USA" this would never have happened.
It will take decades to clean up this mess, if there even is anything to clean up when "Bibi" is done."
Very sensible opinions and agree with everything you have put here
 
Back
Top