BoroMart
Well-known member
I've got fast fingers, or so I'm toldRuddy Nora Marty, I've never seen you type so much....
I've put you forward for job in the typing pool Ahahaha
I've got fast fingers, or so I'm toldRuddy Nora Marty, I've never seen you type so much....
I've put you forward for job in the typing pool Ahahaha
Yeah Laws was 30k, Slaven was what 25k and Pears 60k I think. Pallister was something like 2k and a bag of old footballs and tracksuits, and I think everyone else in the 86 squad was free or from youths. So, even taking inflation into account the whole squad was less than 700k in todays money.For me I think the best were under Willie Maddren, Pears, Pallister, Laws, Slaven, Stephens, Rowell,
a lot of the stats are something that an experienced manager like warnock can just see by watching a player. there are certain stats that when compared together do show an indication of quality but none of them show attitude, mental stability, leadership etc etcYou have to know how to process stats properly. For instance, the defenders in a poor team will have lots of clearances to their name.....it doesn't mean they are the best at clearances, it means they are in a poor team that has lots of defending to do. A single stat on it's own isn't much use, it needs the context of other data and knowledge (acquired from scouting with your eyes).
Coaches are taught to look at the four corner model: Physical, Technical/Tactical, Psychological and Social.a lot of the stats are something that an experienced manager like warnock can just see by watching a player. there are certain stats that when compared together do show an indication of quality but none of them show attitude, mental stability, leadership etc etc
It's true but it must be easier said than done to buy cheap sell high etcPulis said exactly the same. Then again he then went and spent 21mil and paid massive loan fees for Hugill and probably a few quid on Besic.
I think its been the recruitment and wage structure. We simply shouldn't be paying players 20-30k a week (+). It's not healthy for the club.
I think a lot stems back to Monk blowing over 50mil. We still have some of those players and they've probably restricted us in terms of transfers. They ain't good enough but no fecker can sign them as we pay so well.
To think we paid best part of 30mil for Braithwaite / Fletcher and Britt. We moved Braithwaite on for less than half and the others leave for nothing. It's hard to remember us consistently buying low and selling high (that the model you need).
We also saw Clayton / Ayala / George leave for nothing. Why didn't we cash in on them 18 months ago if we knew we couldn't match the current contracts? Again its simply because no fecker could pay them. Why would they leave?
Rudy left for nothing.... Again 6mil down the drain. Downing nothing.
We must be hemeraging cash. Just buy players for a fortune and let them leave for nothing. How much would we get for Saville? 1-2mil at best (didn't Warnock say he offered 2mil when at Cardiff? Why did we pay 7)
We have paid some frankly bizzare fees. The gaffer said the other week that Steve should have phoned him about a few players. He would have said 'don't touch with a barge pole'.... Interesting.
Also damming when he said 'Britts agent deserves a pat on the back'.
All of these things are part of winning games as they set up the culture of the club. It's the same in any work place.All Neil has to do is win football matches, have a team that produces passages of play that excite and entertain the fans and find us a hero.
his not winning football matches, his not exciting or entertaining us and a hero is not forthcoming...
the decor of the team bus, the water pressure of the showers at Hurworth, the post match food menu, the opening hours of the club shop, the lack of a genuine lion being paraded before kick off, dissatisfaction with the design of the club badge, no corner shop outside the ground, local politics, idiots on football message boards, the culinary abortion that is a parmo & Leo's job description are not really things he needs to worry or bother about as requiring change.
Neil is fortunate that there wasnt 3000 Boro fans at Pride Park last Satda' - theyre the ones demanding change - and they would have told him so in a very unsavoury Teesside fashion.
I'm only taking Callum Wilson out of that list.We
We were reccomended
James McCarthy at £1m
James McArthur at £1m
Dan Bentley £1m or less
Charlie Austin at £1m
Callum Wilson at £1.2m
Wilson when at CoventryI'm only taking Callum Wilson out of that list.
Still only taking Wilson. Possibly Austin aswell, been young he wouldn't have the stupid yellow hair he does now.Wilson when at Coventry
Austin when at Swindon
Bentley when at Southend
McCarthy when at Hamilton
McCarthur when at Hamilton
All when they were young and un proven
Yes, agree with that and it seems they have a great strategy in exploiting that strategy. It was more a reference to Warnock being slightly anti-stats, which is the opposite direction to most clubs these days.You have to know how to process stats properly. For instance, the defenders in a poor team will have lots of clearances to their name.....it doesn't mean they are the best at clearances, it means they are in a poor team that has lots of defending to do. A single stat on it's own isn't much use, it needs the context of other data and knowledge (acquired from scouting with your eyes).
Ref transfer fees - the record UK fee now is £85m? and in 1985 it was £1.6m? thats at least a 52 times uplift in fees so Pears who I think was £80k would be around £4.2m in today's money. In 1986 our record fee was £375k for Irving Nattress who we got nothing back on - he probably cost 60 times that in today's money = £22.5m lost. Buying and selling is always hit and miss. Everton will lose £25m transfer fee on Bolasie and get 29 games for that in 5 years.Yeah Laws was 30k, Slaven was what 25k and Pears 60k I think. Pallister was something like 2k and a bag of old footballs and tracksuits, and I think everyone else in the 86 squad was free or from youths. So, even taking inflation into account the whole squad was less than 700k in todays money.
You can't compare record transfer fees, as the base for inflation. This was prior to the champions league, and premier league. The inflation rate for the top 6 teams is that high, for the rest of football it's much smaller.Ref transfer fees - the record UK fee now is £85m? and in 1985 it was £1.6m? thats at least a 52 times uplift in fees so Pears who I think was £80k would be around £4.2m in today's money. In 1986 our record fee was £375k for Irving Nattress who we got nothing back on - he probably cost 60 times that in today's money = £22.5m lost. Buying and selling is always hit and miss. Everton will lose £25m transfer fee on Bolasie and get 29 games for that in 5 years.
Didn’t help in Mowbray’s last year.I think having a proper captain probably helped with that.
Not even got through this whole thread now but this is exactly my feeling too. We seemed to place trust in Pulis to get things in order' but once he'd gone, nothing appeared to have changed and we're left with the same mess. He was warming the seat for Woodgate and that period was nothing short of a disaster, can only imagine what it was like behind the scenes though I will give him credit, we brought in a couple of players who Warnock has got performing, the likes of Dijksteel, Bola.The decisions are the club since Aitor left have been nothing but a disgrace.
We've never learned neither. We blasted the best part of £50m on rubbish under Monk. You'd think we would have smartened up after that, but then comes along Pulis who is happy to tell us all there's problems behind the scenes and proceeds to blast £20m on players we didn't need or he refused to use.
Our decision making in general has been shocking for a good number of years now.
All bang on. The way we overpaid for so many players during the Monk/Pulis times was embarrassing in a way (particularly Monk's with the likes of Johnson's fee etc). Not sure what went on behind the scenes with Monk. I remember initially, I was happy with that appointment and thought he was the guy we should go for. How wrong I turned out to be .. a lot of money spent and nothing achieved on the pitch to reflect the money we'd waxed on all these players .. he was gone in a shot, I'm not 'ITK' but I remember it being unlike Gibbo to let a manager go so quickly .. anyway it's in the pastMonk's signings were significantly worse than Pulis for me. Over paying for Britt, Fletch, Braithwaite and Shotton - Baker not good enough. Howson, Randolph, Johnson and ROI full back (sorry forgotten his name) were OK. Monk particularly failed to get the best from his signings.
The Pulis buys looked solid Championship players when bought, OK he over paid for Saville and Flint. Saville is sound at Championship level. Flint did go backwards. Hugill is doing OK at Norwich, Besic helped us get into the 2018 play offs. McNair is one of our better players and does well for NI. Selling Bamford was a mistake and not taking Harrison back on loan in the Summer of 2018 was another mistake. However Pulis did bring in quite a bit more cash than he spent. Gibson £15m, Traore £20m (with adds ons) Bamford £10m (with add ons).