Colgates_shaving_foam
Well-known member
I think inter had better goal scoring chances, didn't they?
I think inter had better goal scoring chances, didn't they?
Eh? Lucky City? Seriously? The best team clearly won
No, they outplayed the oppositionYep, but they were still lucky.
Joke comment of the night
And Grealish “I played crap tonight”Rodri's interview
"I wasn't very good in the first half...I was **** to be honest"
Don't get that on Sky!!
No, they outplayed the opposition
Why? Boro have already have Carrick, so he will be sensible to stay put really.Yes i can see him leaving after that.
No it's not, they missed the target, simple as thatYes they did. They were still lucky.
The ball bouncing off the bar and not landing in the net is lucky.
So why did City deserve to win then?No it's not, they missed the target, simple as that
Just like any shot that missed the target, or was saved. It's not luck - the striker missed cos they were not accurate enough. Not luck.
Because they outplayed the opposition and scored a goal. It really should not be hard for even a simpleton to understand, and i know you are above that level.So why did City deserve to win then?
So why did City deserve to win then?
Noted.Because they scored a goal and Inter didn't.
What a change seeing luck go against an Italian side at a crucial time. Well done City.
Majority possession, majority of completed passes, dominated the play, dominated the opposition etc etcSo why did City deserve to win then?