No, I think my point is more definite than that. Brexit would not have happened in the manner which you incessantly complain about if the Conservatives had not won a majority (or at least a minority on which they could rely on Brexit Party and DUP support) in 2019. Could not have happened. As a matter of constitutional formality. Because there would not have been a majority to vote for the necessary Act.
Other than the Brexit Party and arguably the DUP there is no other party that could credibly have won seats in that election that would have supported Johnson’s Brexit. So by voting for Johnson’s party, in an absolutely fundamental sense under our constitution, you supported Johnson’s Brexit. It would not have happened if Johnson had not won. And you voted for him and he won. Admittedly, not by one, but your side won.
I fully appreciate that the UK general election is a vote for a package and that you may have had other reasons for voting conservative, which did not relate to Brexit. And I fully appreciate that you have repented of at least some of these. Nevertheless, no party likely to win a credible number of seats has fought a more single issue election than the conservatives in 2019, since Sinn Fein a century earlier. It is no more credible to argue that you were pro EU and voted conservative in 2019, for personal tax reasons, then it would be to argue that you voted for Sinn Fein in 1918 despite being a unionist, merely because you liked their land tax policies.
That is what you don’t seem to accept. As far as any single election could be under our system, 2019 was the general election for hard Brexit and you voted for hard Brexit. If you could accept that we could have a sensible debate over who has repented from what and who still cleaves to former views. Until you do, I will continue to conclude that you are a hypocrite who is lashing out because of subconscious guilt.