Which also puts the poll you posted in the same category then yes?Need to remember twitter is mainly used by younger people though and is essentially an echo chamber on certain topics. 1 million could respond to that poll and its not representative
Any survey to see public opinion needs to use a sample from all aspects of society, not just those that post on twitter
The poll I posted wasn’t done via Twitter though, it takes a sample of people based on genders, religion, policitcs, age, location etc which is meant to give an overall representation of the country.Which also puts the poll you posted in the same category then yes?
The census?Yes the sample size isn’t huge, but it’s about as representative as you will get without sampling millions, which isn’t possible.
Look at the costs involved in the census though, it’s not feasible to do that to get a sample of opinions for a matter that doesn’t really carry much importance.The census?
They aren’t though, at no point has it even been suggested by the government that pubs will be forced to implement this. Seems likely that pubs will be given the option and rightly so, some will but the majority won’t. No big deal reallyDoesn't really matter?
Edit, deleted reply, can't be arsed discussing life changing government dicktats implemented without a public vote with folks who's minds have already been made up.
Eight thousand people took part in that survey.
I understand fully. You get warped answers when questions are led.If you're implying that you don't think that gives a reliable result, then I don't think you really understand how polling (or statistics) works.
In a properly-conducted poll with a representative cross-section of the population including just 1,500 people, the sampling error will typically be around plus or minus 3% with a 95% confidence interval.
This means that statistically, there's a 95% chance that a poll of 1,500 people using valid methodology will give you results that are within 3 percentage points of the actual figure for the entire population.
With higher numbers, the margin of error is even smaller.
There's a fuller explanation on the link below.
How can a sample of only 1,000 or 2,000 possibly reflect the opinions of a nation within a 3% margin of error?
I mean its a fact, some have suggest that and its likely to be the case to be honest. A polling company is about as representative as you will get for something like this. Similar set of results on a yougov survey as well which is interesting.
Read the entire report. When the question was reframed to "Do you think vaccinated people should have the same restrictions as unvaccinated" 92% said yes they should. I did post this about 2 or 3 pages back, stats as always can be used to support diametrically opposed arguments with a bit of framing.I mean its a fact, some have suggest that and its likely to be the case to be honest. A polling company is about as representative as you will get for something like this. Similar set of results on a yougov survey as well which is interesting.
Not overly bothered either way personally, its not going to be forced on pubs or even been suggested that the government will force it either. Really dont know why people are so annoyed about it, some will use it, some wont.
Probably a better survey with the questions used, and still very similar results
Most Britons support a COVID-19 vaccine passport system | YouGov
Britons are opposed to private companies being allowed to develop vaccine passports, howeveryougov.co.uk
Which is exactly what you have just done. Its a very broad question though, but when you look at the breakdown for this in different settings, it would suggest that people actually do favour this in certain settings more than others eg pubs.Read the entire report. When the question was reframed to "Do you think vaccinated people should have the same restrictions as unvaccinated" 92% said yes they should. I did post this about 2 or 3 pages back, stats as always can be used to support diametrically opposed arguments with a bit of framing.
It's not a very broad question at all, it deliberately removes "pubs" from the question to get a balanced response. It was framed that way for a reason. You cannot take one poll over the other, but balance your opinion on what the public want by using both sets of results.Very broad question though, but when you look at the breakdown for this in different settings, it would suggest that people actually do favour this in some settings more than others
Its not just pubs though, look at the results on hospitals, garden centres, restaurants, shops, gyms, carehomes etc. All have a fairly significant amount in support of the measuresIt's not a very broad question at all, it deliberately removes "pubs" from the question to get a balanced response. It was framed that way for a reason. You cannot take one poll over the other, but balance your opinion on what the public want by using both sets of results.
I mean its a fact, some have suggest that and its likely to be the case to be honest. A polling company is about as representative as you will get for something like this. Similar set of results on a yougov survey as well which is interesting.
Not overly bothered either way personally, its not going to be forced on pubs or even been suggested that the government will force it either. Really dont know why people are so annoyed about it, some will use it, some wont.
Probably a better survey with the questions used, and still very similar results
Most Britons support a COVID-19 vaccine passport system | YouGov
Britons are opposed to private companies being allowed to develop vaccine passports, howeveryougov.co.uk
What about people who haven't been offered a vaccine yet Holgate? Like 20s, 30s, etc? They have suffered loads in this... but seems like they are overlookedYes from me, why not create a safer environment for all, and why wouldn’t people want to have the vaccine, unless for some misguided principle or just to exercise a rite.
Thats a completely separate topic though, natural for people to say they should be subject to the same restrictions when such a low percentage of the population is currently fully vaccinated, expect that will change once more receive a vaccine . But thats a completely different question to asking about a vaccine passport, which if you look further into the link, the responses show a fair proportion agree with them in certain settings such as pubsLiterally from your link:-
'There does appear to be something of a contradiction in public opinion, however. A vaccine passport system inevitably involves allowing some Britons access to activities while depriving others. A separate YouGov survey recently found that, when asked whether those who have been vaccinated should or should not be subject to the same restrictions as everyone else, Britons are overwhelmingly of the view that they should (79%). Clearly, the way the concept is framed can have a huge impact on support.'
Polls aren't used to gauge public opinion they are used to influence it.