When will we stop asking people who are asymptomatic or have only mild symptoms to isolate?

If you can ,get your jab and help your community out. Or sign something to say you are happy for NHS staff not to put themselves at risk by treating you if you are unwell. No ambulance no doctors no nursing care and no meds.
Why should anyone put themselves out to help you I wouldn't expect many of the biggest protesters to get their pens out.
 
Scrote said:
Literally the first line of the original post:

"The time will come when we step down the testing and just let it spread in the knowledge that only a small minority will suffer negative consequences."
Click to expand...
The time will come.
 
Blf said:
If you can ,get your jab and help your community out. Or sign something to say you are happy for NHS staff not to put themselves at risk by treating you if you are unwell. No ambulance no doctors no nursing care and no meds.
Why should anyone put themselves out to help you I wouldn't expect many of the biggest protesters to get their pens out.
Click to expand...
Had to re read that last line, I thought there was an extra "i" 🤣🤣
 
Blf said:
If you can ,get your jab and help your community out. Or sign something to say you are happy for NHS staff not to put themselves at risk by treating you if you are unwell. No ambulance no doctors no nursing care and no meds.
Why should anyone put themselves out to help you I wouldn't expect many of the biggest protesters to get their pens out.
Click to expand...
Dumbest post of the thread. The thing is Blf you know that and still posted anyway.

Do those not vaccinated get a tax reduction?.. Know what don't bother answering. I am getting as daft as you now
 
Laughing said:
The time will come.
Click to expand...
Read the rest of the post. The context is quite clear.

And if you're still struggling with the comprehension then the OP added this later:

Mwelolo said:
Those who are vulnerable will need to be shielded to varying degrees.

Those who choose not to be vaccinated can face the consequences of their own foolishness.
Click to expand...

If you really want to argue that he isn't suggesting we return to normal at any cost - leaving people to their fate - then your grasp of the English language is worse than I thought.
 
Scrote said:
Read the rest of the post. The context is quite clear.

And if you're still struggling with the comprehension then the OP added this later:



If you really want to argue that he isn't suggesting we return to normal at any cost - leaving people to their fate - then your grasp of the English language is worse than I thought.
Click to expand...
Let's leave the insults right there shall we.
 
Chris_Boro said:
I mean, you jump into this thread with a sarcastic first line then show that you clearly have not read or understood it yourself.

That freedom for the "majority" at the cost of those who are vulnerable was the whole debate.
Click to expand...
Jump on to this thread? You mean contribute my thoughts? Just because you don't agree doesn't mean I am jumping on anything. For heavens sake.
 
Laughing said:
Jump on to this thread? You mean contribute my thoughts? Just because you don't agree doesn't mean I am jumping on anything. For heavens sake.
Click to expand...

And anyone with a modicum of impartiality will laugh at those contributions, especially as they show you never understood what was being debated while added things that were not said.

Freedoms regardless of consequences is not acceptable.
 
Chris_Boro said:
And anyone with a modicum of impartiality will laugh at those contributions, especially as they show you never understood what was being debated while added things that were not said.

Freedoms regardless of consequences is not acceptable.
Click to expand...
You are going to have to continue on your own Chris, not interested in getting in to a slagging match with you or any one else.

Have a good evening.
 
I can’t really see any scenario when not isolating when positive will be an option. Not calling for any restrictions but the ability to go anywhere and infect anyone whilst positive will end up with the vulnerable not being able to leave their homes for fear of catching it
 
Mwelolo said:
There is only a small number of NHS staff who are not vaccinated in the north east.

Any of those who refuse to take responsibility for their own or other people’s health will rightly be removed from front line services.

The numbers are not big enough to make much of a difference.
Click to expand...
I don’t think that is really true as anyone will tell you who work a 24x7 shift system. Remove one or two people then perhaps you can manage but more than that and you’ll soon be overwhelmed, and people who are exhausted.
 
Mwelolo said:
There is only a small number of NHS staff who are not vaccinated in the north east.

Any of those who refuse to take responsibility for their own or other people’s health will rightly be removed from front line services.

The numbers are not big enough to make much of a difference.
Click to expand...
www.chroniclelive.co.uk

'Majority' of North East NHS staff are jabbed, but hundreds still unvaccinated

Most North East hospital staff have had their Covid jabs, but hundreds remain unvaccinated and NHS Trusts are making plans to convince them ahead of next year's deadline.
www.chroniclelive.co.uk www.chroniclelive.co.uk

Can the North East get rid of 2000 front line staff and not notice "much of a difference"?
Who do you replace them with?
If we take your arguement to its practical conclusion - that number of staff [for example] is equivalent to 40% of North Tees Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
Which services would you close down?
Breast screening?
Neurology?
Burns unit?
All Outpatients?
Stroke wards?
Pediatrics?
Maxilofacial unit?
Renal?

By having to do that, it effectively means some people will die because services couldnt operate effectively.
Who will make the decision as to who`s life is more valuable than another?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top