This Dominic Cummings COVID meeting

That argument is sunk before it even gets going. If you are going to say those who held Cummings up as a liar now want to believe him, you absolutely have to accept that those who held Cummings up as reliable and full of integrity now want to make out he is a liar.

Cuts both ways.
So if I'm right, your premise is that anyone calling Cummins a liar now had to believe he was "reliable and full of integrity" before his sacking. I doubt anyone believed that as soon a the Barnard castle story surfaced so your argument is unsound. Most I believe were calling for his sacking immediately and I was certainly one of them. What a fool he was to be the architect of the rule and the one to break it. My point remains that it is no surprise that todays comments are an absolute gift for those who hate and despise the Government and I'm not in the least surprised that they are celebrating.
 
He backed off the starkness of those words. I think he turned it to who do we need to protect.
I guess once a situation is out of control that's the decision those in power need to make. Be it a pandemic, a terrorist attack, a war or a natural disaster. Once you recognise it's no longer containable you have to ask that question
 
So if I'm right, your premise is that anyone calling Cummins a liar now had to believe he was "reliable and full of integrity" before his sacking. I doubt anyone believed that as soon a the Barnard castle story surfaced so your argument is unsound. Most I believe were calling for his sacking immediately and I was certainly one of them. What a fool he was to be the architect of the rule and the one to break it. My point remains that it is no surprise that todays comments are an absolute gift for those who hate and despise the Government and I'm not in the least surprised that they are celebrating.
Only in the same way that your premise was that all those now saying Cummings is telling the truth cast him as a devil last year. Every point you make regarding this has the opposite argument just waiting to be made.
 
You'd have no vaccines if it weren't for Cummings and two others.
Hmm. Cummins secured vaccines and a couple of others were involved?

Strange that Kate Bingham who was Chair of the Vaccine task Force and extremely well positioned to negotiate with suppliers is not the first person you thought of. She absolutely hit it out of the park on supply and that performance was the envy of the World. You'd have to help me with Cummins great victory on vaccines - I've failed to find any reference to his involvement.
 
Correct. No mention of his mates Gove or Rishi in all this..
He mentioned Rishi earlier,
Hmm. Cummins secured vaccines and a couple of others were involved?

Strange that Kate Bingham who was Chair of the Vaccine task Force and extremely well positioned to negotiate with suppliers is not the first person you thought of. She absolutely hit it out of the park on supply and that performance was the envy of the World. You'd have to help me with Cummins great victory on vaccines - I've failed to find any reference to his involvement.
cummings said Vallance used contacts to get doses of AZ I think on order well before the vaccine task force was even established. He did say she performed well but didn’t face similar bottlenecks when trying to sort things.

The other thing of note was Cummings name dropping Gupta and Heneghan (of great barrington defecation fame) with regards to advising not to have a circuit breaker in September. That cost tens of thousands of lives. Hopefully they get dragged into the inquiry for a grilling. Their misinformation has cost lives.
 
Only in the same way that your premise was that all those now saying Cummings is telling the truth cast him as a devil last year. Every point you make regarding this has the opposite argument just waiting to be made.
I think you need to refer to my original post as you have misinterpreted it.
I said "Wasn't at all difficult to predict the flood of manic lefties who, after casting Dominic Cummins as the devil incarnate last year now want to adopt him as a new Saint."
What I didn't say was "all those now saying." I said a "flood" which you may accept as many and as I have already said it is wrong to assume that those claiming today he has form as a liar will have had exactly the same opinion when he was still employed.
 
I think you need to refer to my original post as you have misinterpreted it.
I said "Wasn't at all difficult to predict the flood of manic lefties who, after casting Dominic Cummins as the devil incarnate last year now want to adopt him as a new Saint."
What I didn't say was "all those now saying." I said a "flood" which you may accept as many and as I have already said it is wrong to assume that those claiming today he has form as a liar will have had exactly the same opinion when he was still employed.
I suggest you let off the adolescent labeling and explain to the families, friends and loved ones of the 150,000 dead, just how many could have been saved had the "Government" [!?] not acted like a public school prom - and more like a responsible Government of 62,000,000 people.
Being a smart arz isnt helping those still grieving - including Doctors and Nurses who died trying to save the lives of others.
 
I suggest you let off the adolescent labeling and explain to the families, friends and loved ones of the 150,000 dead, just how many could have been saved had the "Government" [!?] not acted like a public school prom - and more like a responsible Government of 62,000,000 people.
Being a smart arz isnt helping those still grieving - including Doctors and Nurses who died trying to save the lives of others.
And here it comes. I assume you are referring to "manic lefties." Well that's pretty weak labelling on my part when compared to some of the name-calling normally found in this forum. (Including in your post). Since you are the one making suggestions why don't you explain your position to the public and how you would have solved the situation? I'm sure they'd be gripped and gain much solace from it.
 
that whiteboard is scary

Ben W and MW are brothers. You can see from the whiteboard they are thinking ‘app’ already. MW was awarded a 250m contract around an app.
 
The thing I picked up reading those comments was the amount of people who went into hospital for non covid related illnesses and caught it whilst I'm there. That in itself is also a scandal up there with releasing infected patients into infection free care homes. Nobody will say anything about it though.
The Guardian tried to get details on the number who got it and the number who died. South Tees was one of the minority that didn't comply with the request.
 
I think you need to refer to my original post as you have misinterpreted it.
I said "Wasn't at all difficult to predict the flood of manic lefties who, after casting Dominic Cummins as the devil incarnate last year now want to adopt him as a new Saint."
What I didn't say was "all those now saying." I said a "flood" which you may accept as many and as I have already said it is wrong to assume that those claiming today he has form as a liar will have had exactly the same opinion when he was still employed.
As a bona fide leftie & I make no apologies for that I really do not regard this moron as the new saint at all very very far from it as I said on another thread if this fool tells me its raining I wouldn't just look out the window I would go outside to double check by feeling the actual raindrops for myself.

If this does prove to be true some of it has shocked me but none of it surprises me in the slightest & it would as a leftie it might be a day to celebrate but until it is proved I will hold the celebrations until it has toppled this cruel sadistic bunch of greedy self serving shysters.

A bit like waiting for VAR to confirm a marginal goal.

But I very much believe the media would be the video referee controlling VAR back at Stockley park reviewing it who will sweep this under the carpet as quickly & quietly as possible.
 
Fair enough Juan. Reasoned response. Frankly I'd be quite surprised if the TV News programmes don't have a good crack at it - can't imagine that Hancock or any other Minister will fancy first go tomorrow. The papers of course will side with their political leanings.
 
Fair enough Juan. Reasoned response. Frankly I'd be quite surprised if the TV News programmes don't have a good crack at it - can't imagine that Hancock or any other Minister will fancy first go tomorrow. The papers of course will side with their political leanings.
I hope they do Rav but I doubt it the BBC certainly wont & the jury is still out on ITV.
Sadly very sadly we will never know the truth until it can all be revealed in 30 years time.
 
There's usually a lot of things (in addition to covid) that we don't find out for 30 years and it's possible that some of us won't be around to see them. My fervent hope is that the World sees a conclusion to this crisis and that we can get back to something that we once knew as normal.
 
Fair enough Juan. Reasoned response. Frankly I'd be quite surprised if the TV News programmes don't have a good crack at it - can't imagine that Hancock or any other Minister will fancy first go tomorrow. The papers of course will side with their political leanings.
Hancock’s got an urgent question in parliament tomorrow and then a COVID press briefing at 5. Could be interesting...
 
Back
Top